Search results

Ha. You need to read a few more Michigan message boards then.

Ahh. My main point was a player like Boren on your roster affects recruiting at his position...whether it be last year, this year, or next year.... I see what you are saying though. Good point.

Interesting. Why do you feel that way? So we are clear, if Boren was not on the roster at all it would still be the "same ol' same ol'?"

If you do not think Boren being on the roster does not affect the number of schollie OL we have/they pursue then I think you are being naive. I understand your stance and what you are saying though. For example though, let's say the target for the staff is 17. If you have a player like Boren...

Link To Story...

Boren.

It is a poor choice of words. I do think it is a mere formality unless he stops getting bigger from this point on. Isn't he roughly 6'8'' and 285?

He said he didn't get along with "any" of them? Plus, I think Ant is on the right path.

7 of those top 9 are either freshman or sophomores. I think there has been an obvious upgrade in the talent the staff has brought in. If they still "under perform" I think the "more OL" train may pick up some steam.

Ouch...

??? He is expected to play quite a bit if he makes it in. Is this a guess?

^^^ I have gotten similar info from a few people. Throw in Beaver's "backtrack" posts about "not being too upset if he goes with the class of 2010" make me believe them a bit more...

:slappy::slappy:

:confused:

Obviously I do not personally know how he knows but I doubt Duane would speak on the subject unless he had some pretty solid info.

He expanded on the subject... What separates the successes from the failures Good read....

Scout $ 05/27 From GBW.com...Michigan gets verbal #11 with Jordan Paskorz joining the class.

Cannot see these at work (hope they show up)...

Looks like Lebron is toying with them...

Scout $