• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Yet another father of the year candidate.

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
MaxBuck;1153917; said:
1. It was pepper spray; not mace.

2. There's a long distance from "having a problem with" his behavior and thinking it warrants jail time. I have a problem with lots of behaviors that are not, and should not be, jailable offenses.

3. If this had any long-term effects on the infant's health, my answer would be entirely different.
Click to expand...


hmmmm..... why not just change your avitar to your aclu card?
 
Upvote 0
MaxBuck;1153917; said:
1. It was pepper spray; not mace.

2. There's a long distance from "having a problem with" his behavior and thinking it warrants jail time. I have a problem with lots of behaviors that are not, and should not be, jailable offenses.

3. If this had any long-term effects on the infant's health, my answer would be entirely different.
Click to expand...

In your first post, you did state that you do not endorse what this guy did.

But

1. Whether it was pepper spray or mace, neither is really desirable now is it? Spraying pepper spray (or mace) into a child's face does warrant a charge of child abuse.

2. This "man" has only been arrested and charged with aggravated battery and child abuse. He hasn't been convicted yet nor has any sentence been imposed yet. We'll see what happens in the sentencing phase, but I would hope that many (most) in this country would consider spraying pepper spray in the face of an infant (or child) to be child abuse, and I would hope that many (most) in this country would react accordingly for sentencing.

3. I trust that there will be no long term effects on the infant, but whether or not one has long term effects should not be the litmus test for what constitutes child abuse.
 
Upvote 0
Originally Posted by MaxBuck
1. It was pepper spray; not mace.

2. There's a long distance from "having a problem with" his behavior and thinking it warrants jail time. I have a problem with lots of behaviors that are not, and should not be, jailable offenses.

3. If this had any long-term effects on the infant's health, my answer would be entirely different.
Click to expand...



buckiprof;1155760; said:
In your first post, you did state that you do not endorse what this guy did.

But

1. Whether it was pepper spray or mace, neither is really desirable now is it? Spraying pepper spray (or mace) into a child's face does warrant a charge of child abuse.

2. This "man" has only been arrested and charged with aggravated battery and child abuse. He hasn't been convicted yet nor has any sentence been imposed yet. We'll see what happens in the sentencing phase, but I would hope that many (most) in this country would consider spraying pepper spray in the face of an infant (or child) to be child abuse, and I would hope that many (most) in this country would react accordingly for sentencing.

3. I trust that there will be no long term effects on the infant, but whether or not one has long term effects should not be the litmus test for what constitutes child abuse.
Click to expand...
kcd00180010.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Unfortunately, it sounds like pepper spray won't be the worst thing that happens to this poor kid, with two idiots for parents. :shake:
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top