I don't even care about the Fickell thing. Luke was put in a crappy situation. He got us through it - not in spectacular fashion, but we survived. Meyer came. I'm happy - no, I'm elated.
I do have a problem with the premise that leadership starts with emotion. Pure nonsense. Leadership starts with knowledge, experience, and a set of principles that allows one to share their knowledge and experience and present a plan to address needs. If we are dropped in the middle of the Amazon 100 miles from civilization, I want to hear from the guy who knows how to get me out, particularly if he has done it before. I would like him to explain to me how he knows what he knows, and then I want to see him put it into action. I would follow because I would have absolutely no idea how to survive in that situation. If the guy is able to give me confidence in him and motivate me, all the better. The ability to inspire confidence and motivate is false if the guy doesn't really know how to lead me out. The ultimate trait of true leadership is the result. The leader's emotion, or mine, is irrelevant regardless of the result. But people are emotional beings, and while it helps for a leader to know how to manage, direct, and even manipulate the emotions of followers, it's secondary to knowledge, experience, and principles.
One more thought on leadership. I've seen situations where someone tries to appoint a leader, or appoint themself as a leader. Bad idea. It's not hard to identify leaders. They are the ones who lead and others follow. They don't have to have anyone appoint them, and they never have to say they are in charge. They just are in charge. There are few things worse than being force-led by a "leader" who isn't.