• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Why It Is So Frustrating Being a Buckeye Fan

LordJeffBuck

Illuminatus Emeritus
Staff member
BP Recruiting Team
Frustration - a feeling of dissatisfaction, often accompanied by anxiety or depression, resulting from unfulfilled needs or unresolved problems; a feeling of annoyance at being hindered; the condition that results when an internal impulse or an action is thwarted by an external force.

We're all fans of The Ohio State University, the Best Damned Team in the Land. We've got great players, excellent coaches, The Horseshoe, the Woody Hayes Athletic Center, Script Ohio, and all that. And we've got history - seven national championships, thirty-three Big Ten championships (seventeen outright), seven Heisman Trophies, one hundred eighty first-team All Americans, thirty-six Academic All Americans, and twenty-six members of the College Football Hall of Fame. Simply put, we are an elite program, the best of the best. Every year we expect to win it all ... and almost every year we go home disappointed.

I suppose that going home disappointed is the essence of being a fan - we always expect the moon and the stars ... and then we watch in disbelief as our season crashes and burns like a meteor. And then, depending on our dispositions, we gripe and complain and bitch and moan and say things like "Fire the coaches!" or "Our team sucks!" or "At least we beat Michigan!" or "We could be Notre Dame LOL" and of course "Wait until next year...."

As Buckeye fans, we expect to win. Scratch that ... we deserve to win. It's our entitlement, because our team is the best. After this year's Penn State game, a tough loss that really should have been a victory, I said that "the Buckeyes are supposed to win 80-90% of their games." Now, I realize that my statement contains a sprig of hyperbole and a dash of wishful thinking, but in reality Ohio State has won eighty percent or more of its games enough times that such seasons could practically be considered "normal". Sure we have our down years, even our down eras, just like everybody else ... but unlike almost anybody else, we can reasonably expect to win, to win big, to win it all, each and every season. And when we don't win, there must be something wrong in the college football universe, and that is the source of our collective frustration.

Of course, we don't have any empathy for fans of other schools, because we are supposed to win, not them. How could they be frustrated when they lose? When a Penn State or a Michigan or a Georgia or a Texas blows a national championship, it's not a shock or even a surprise ... it's just the natural order of things. And when they do somehow happen to win, it's only because they got lucky ... and they didn't play anybody ... and they're media darlings ... and obviously they cheated ... and we could've beaten them anyway....

Over the last forty years, Ohio State has had numerous seasons in which the team has won more than 80% of its games[sup]1[/sup], yet during that time the Buckeye Nation has only two national titles (1968 and 2002) to show for all of that "greatness". I imagine that fans of most programs would be thrilled with results like that ... but as Ohio State fans, we expect just a little bit more from our team, don't we? We know that Ohio State is an "elite" program, and many objective facts support our assertion: the overall record, the bowl appearances, the Big Ten titles, the major award winners, the All Americans, and so on and so forth. And still, with all of that team success and with all of those individual accolades, our beloved Buckeyes have earned just two national championships in the past four decades, because every year, something always seems to go wrong for us. And that is precisely why being a Buckeye fan can be so damned frustrating.

However, if we could be absolutely, totally, completely, and perfectly objective and impartial for just a minute or two, don't fans of Oklahoma and Tennessee and Florida State ... and even Southern Cal and Notre Dame ... suffer as many disappointments and heartbreaks as we do? Haven't those teams, and many others besides, suffered their fair share of boneheaded plays, stupid coaching decisions, blown calls, unlucky bounces, untimely injuries, media biases, unbelieveable upsets, and agonizing losses that have cost them the national titles that they deserved?

Maybe ... but then again, maybe not. Maybe the Buckeyes really are more cursed and snakebitten than any other team. I've been a fan of the Cleveland Indians for as long as I can remember (nearly forty years), and the Cavaliers as well. When I attended Amherst College, I adopted the Boston Red Sox for a few seasons, and vicariously suffered through the fiasco that was the 1986 World Series (made all the worse because there were so many Mets fans on campus). I was even a Browns fan for a while, before the meds kicked in. Each of those teams had their share of heartbreaks along the way - The Drive, The Fumble, The Move, The Shot, Jose Mesa, Bill Buckner, and so on and so forth - and there were no championships to alleviate the pain - but somehow it always felt worse when the Buckeyes blew it. And it seemed like the Buckeyes blew it a lot. While I could generally rest assured that the Indians would be out of contention by the First of May, the Buckeyes were always in the thick of things right until the end, with the end often being a loss (or tie) to Michigan in The Game (1969, 1973, 1993, 1995, 1996, 2003), or to some Pac-8/10 team in the Rose Bowl (1970, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1979), or more recently a beat down in the BCS Title Game (2006, 2007). All of which got me to thinking: Was there any way to quantify a Buckeye fan's frustrations, some sort of college football "misery index" that we could use to prove that we had been screwed, blued, tattooed, and barbequed worse than any other fan base? Having lived through four decades of SNAFU's and FUBAR's, I was certain that it could be done....

________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] For ease or reference, I shall sometimes call such seasons "eighty-plus seasons".
 
Last edited:
The Early Days of Buckeye Football: Just Trying to Gain Some Respect

In its earliest days, college football was literally dominated by East Coast private schools, primarily members of the Ivy League. Between the inaugural 1869 season and 1900, only five schools won national championships[sup]1[/sup]: Yale (14 full, 1 split); Princeton (9 full, 2 split); Harvard (4 full); Penn (2 full); and Lafayette (1 split). By the turn of the century, however, other schools, primarily in the midwest, began to erode the East Coast hegemony.

Unfortunately for Buckeye fans, Michigan was the first of the non-Ivies to make a name for itself on the national scene, as the Wolverines won four straight national championships between 1901 and 1904, in the process compiling a record of 43-0-1 and outscoring their opposition by 2,326 to 40[sup]2[/sup]. In 1905, the University of Chicago, then a member of the Big Ten, beat Michigan by the score of 2-0 in the final game of the year, thereby completing a perfect 11-0-0 season and earning their first and only national title. Over the next three decades, Big Ten teams would win eight more national championships, and schools from the West Coast (Cal, Southern Cal) and the Deep South (Alabama, Georgia Tech) also began to emerge on the national scene. Although a few Ivy League schools would remain national title contenders into the mid-1920's, it was clear that the balance of power in the college football world had rapidly shifted away from the East Coast, and history would prove that shift to be permanent.

Although Midwestern schools like Michigan, Illinois, Notre Dame, and even Chicago were winning national championships during the first quarter of the last century, Ohio State was rather slow to make a name for itself as a college football powerhouse. During the early years, the high point of Buckeye football was the Chic Harley era (1916, 1917, 1919), when the team went 21-1-1 and received some minor retrospective national titles (Soren Sorenson in 1916 and 1917; Loren Maxwell in 1916); in fact, Harley's only loss came in his last collegiate game, a 9-7 setback to Illinois, one of the recognized national champions in 1919. After Harley left Columbus, however, the Buckeyes entered a long period of stagnation in which the team would be overshadowed by other Big Ten schools (Minnesota, Michigan, Illinois) and Notre Dame. In fact, the Buckeyes would have to wait more than twenty years to earn their first "recognized" national championship.
________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] All championships prior to 1936 have been determined retroactively by various organizations of college football historians, and computer analysts who have applied their models back to the inception of college football. The retroactive championships dicussed in this article are those that have been recognized by the NCAA: Link.
[sup]2[/sup] For example, in 1902, Michigan beat Ohio State 86-0.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
The Buckeyes from 1941-1967: Sowing the Seeds of Greatness

Although Ohio State compiled a respectable 221-91-26 record (.692 winning percentage) between 1901 and 1940, it took a true football genius to get the Buckeyes over the top in the minds of the national media. In 1941, Paul Brown, a legend at Massillon Washington High School[sup]1[/sup], took over the reins at Ohio State, and he promptly led the team to a 6-1-1 record. The very next season, the Buckeyes went 9-1-0, and won the 1942 Associated Press (AP) national championship. Brown left after a disappointing 1943 season, but his replacement, Carroll Widdoes, guided the team to a perfect 9-0-0 season in 1944. After another decade of stagnation, Woody Hayes led Ohio State to national titles in 1954, 1957, and 1961; however, despite reaching pinnacles of excellence, Woody's record during his non-championship seasons prior to 1968 was only 80-40-6 (a .659 winning percentage).

In other words, it seemed like every time the Buckeyes had a truly great season during their formative years, they won some sort of national championship. Between 1936 (the first year of the AP poll) and 1967, the Buckeyes won five more-or-less respectable national titles:
1942: _9-1-0 (0.900) Associated Press
1944: _9-0-0 (1.000) "civilian" national championship[sup]2[/sup]
1954: 10-0-0 (1.000) Associated Press[sup]3[/sup]
1957: _9-1-0 (0.900) United Press; Football Writers[sup]4[/sup]
1961: _8-0-1 (0.944) Football Writers[sup]5[/sup]
However, the rest of the time, the Buckeyes had plenty of decent seasons (with a few clunkers thrown in), but they were generally mediocre and they were never really a serious threat to win it all:
1941: 6-1-1 (.813)
1943: 3-6-0 (.333)
1945: 7-2-0 (.778)
1946: 4-3-2 (.556)
1947: 2-6-1 (.278)
1948: 6-3-0 (.667)
1949: 7-1-2 (.800)
1950: 6-3-0 (.667)
1951: 4-3-2 (.556)
1952: 6-3-0 (.667)
1953: 6-3-0 (.667)
1955: 7-2-0 (.778)
1956: 6-3-0 (.667)
1958: 6-1-2 (.778)
1959: 3-5-1 (.389)
1960: 7-2-0 (.778)
1962: 6-3-0 (.667)
1963: 5-3-1 (.611)
1964: 7-2-0 (.778)
1965: 7-2-0 (.778)
1966: 4-5-0 (.444)
1967: 6-3-0 (.667)​
So, in the 22 non-title years between 1941 and 1967, the Buckeyes hit the .800 winning percentage mark only twice (1941 and 1949), and finished with a combined record of 121-65-12, for an overall .641 winning percentage. Even with the championship years thrown into the mix, the Buckeyes' record during the time in question was 166-67-13, for a .701 winning percentage, which was not materially better than their mark (.692) in the early days.

Therefore, prior to 1967, the Buckeyes could best be described as a team that was rarely great ... but when they were great, they were also champions.
____________________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] In nine seasons at Massillon Washington, Brown compiled a record of 80-8-2, won six straight state titles (1935-1940), and four high school national championships (1935, 1936, 1939, 1940).
[sup]2[/sup] Army (9-0-0) won the AP title in 1944; Ohio State placed second in the poll.
[sup]3[/sup] UCLA (9-0-0) won the UP and Football Writers titles in 1954; Ohio State finished second in the UP poll.
[sup]4[/sup] Auburn (10-0-0) won the AP title in 1957; Ohio State placed second in the poll.
[sup]5[/sup] Alabama (11-0-0) won the AP and UPI titles in 1961; Ohio finished second in both polls.
 
Upvote 0
The Buckeyes from 1968: Enduring Greatness or High-Level Mediocrity?

The 1968 season was not only the Buckeyes' first consensus national championship, but it also marked the point when Ohio State became a consistently great team and a frequent national title contender. Or did they? Certainly, Ohio State has been a frequent national title contender during the past forty years, but does that fact alone make a team consistently great? The Buckeyes have had several eighty-plus seasons during the past four decades, and their overall winning percentage during that time is nearly .800, but the national titles have been few and far between despite the overall high level of play.

From 1968 to 2007, the Buckeyes compiled a record of 363-105-8, for a .771 winning percentage, which places Ohio State third amongst Division 1-A teams behind only Nebraska (.796) and Michigan (.777)[sup]1[/sup]. During that period, the Buckeyes won eighty percent or more of their games seventeen times:
1968: 10-0-0 (1.000); consensus national champion
1969: _8-1-0 (0.889)
1970: _9-1-0 (0.900)
1972: _9-2-0 (0.818)
1973: 10-0-1 (0.955)
1974: 10-2-0 (0.833)
1975: 11-1-0 (0.917)
1979: 11-1-0 (0.917)
1993: 10-1-1 (0.875)
1995: 11-2-0 (0.846)
1996: 11-1-0 (0.917)
1998: 11-1-0 (0.917)
2002: 14-0-0 (1.000); consensus national champion
2003: 11-2-0 (0.846)
2005: 10-2-0 (0.833)
2006: 12-1-0 (0.923)
2007: 11-2-0 (0.846)​
In addition, the Buckeyes won seventy-five percent or more of their games another ten times during the last forty years:
1976: _9-2-1 (.792)
1977: _9-3-0 (.750)
1980: _9-3-0 (.750)
1981: _9-3-0 (.750)
1982: _9-3-0 (.750)
1983: _9-3-0 (.750)
1984: _9-3-0 (.750)
1985: _9-3-0 (.750)
1986: 10-3-0 (.769)
1997: 10-3-0 (.769)​
Thus, from 1968 to 2007, the Buckeyes won less than seventy-five percent of their games only thirteen times:
1971: 6-4-0 (.600)
1978: 7-4-1 (.625)
1987: 6-4-1 (.591)
1988: 4-6-1 (.409)
1989: 8-4-0 (.667)
1990: 7-4-1 (.625)
1991: 8-4-0 (.667)
1992: 8-3-1 (.708)
1994: 9-4-0 (.692)
1999: 6-6-0 (.500)
2000: 8-4-0 (.667)
2001: 7-5-0 (.583)
2004: 8-4-0 (.667)​
If a team wins at least eighty percent of its games, then it should contend for a national title. With that being the case, the Buckeyes have been in title contention no less than seventeen times since 1968, and they have been on the cusp of contending another ten times. And yet, despite being in serious contention over forty percent of the time, "we" have just a pair of national championships as a reward for all of "our" greatness.
__________________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] With the 2008 season factored into the equation, Ohio State has moved into second place, edging out Michigan by a score of .773 to .764; Nebraska has slipped a bit to .793, but still maintains the top spot.
 
Upvote 0
Comparative Frustration: How Have Other Teams Fared?

During the past forty seasons, Ohio State has had seventeen eighty-plus seasons, and with a win against Texas in the Fiesta Bowl, they will also reach that milestone in 2008. With so many eighty-plus seasons to their credit, it is obvious that the Buckeyes have been national titles contenders quite frequently, but how does Ohio State stack up with other teams over the same period of time? As is turns out, only a few teams have had success equal to or better than the Buckeyes when it comes to compiling seasons with a winning percentage of .800 or better[sup]1[/sup]:
Nebraska................21 seasons
Penn State.............18 seasons
Florida State...........17 seasons
Ohio State.............17 seasons
Michigan.................17 seasons
Oklahoma................16 seasons
Miami.....................15 seasons
Southern Cal...........14 seasons
Alabama.................14 seasons
Texas....................14 seasons
Tennessee..............13 seasons
Auburn...................13 seasons
Georgia..................12 seasons
Florida...................12 seasons
Notre Dame..............9 seasons
Arkansas..................9 seasons
UCLA.......................9 seasons
Washington..............8 seasons
Texas A+M...............8 seasons
Clemson...................8 seasons
Louisiana State.........7 seasons
Virginia Tech............7 seasons
West Virginia............6 seasons
Colorado..................6 seasons
North Carolina...........5 seasons
Kansas State............5 seasons
Arizona State............4 seasons
Pittsburgh................4 seasons
Wisconsin.................4 seasons
Syracuse..................4 seasons
Louisville...................4 seasons
Iowa........................4 seasons
Oklahoma State..........3 seasons
Boston College...........3 seasons
Oregon.....................3 seasons
Purdue......................3 seasons
Kansas......................3 seasons
Illinois.......................3 seasons
Washington State.......2 seasons
Georgia Tech..............2 seasons
Texas Tech................2 seasons
California....................2 seasons
Maryland....................2 seasons
Missouri.....................2 seasons
Arizona......................2 seasons
Mississippi State..........1 season
Michigan State............1 season
South Carolina.............1 season
Northwestern..............1 season
Oregon State..............1 season
South Florida..............1 season
Mississippi..................1 season
Cincinnati...................1 season
Kentucky....................1 season
Rutgers......................1 season
Baylor........................1 season
North Carolina State.....0 seasons
Wake Forest...............0 seasons
Connecticut................0 seasons
Iowa State.................0 seasons
Vanderbilt...................0 seasons
Minnesota...................0 seasons
Stanford.....................0 seasons
Indiana.......................0 seasons
Virginia.......................0 seasons
Duke..........................0 seasons​
Although there are a few surprises on the list (for example, both Notre Dame and Arkansas having the same number of eighty-plus seasons since 1968), the top schools are a veritable "Who's Who" of college football, so Ohio State is in good company so far. But remember, "contending" is not quite the same thing as "winning", at least when national championships are at stake.

___________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] Only BCS teams are listed. For teams that moved up into BCS conferences since 1968, only seasons after the move were counted; note that several schools had eighty-plus seasons prior to their respective moves: Arizona State (7 seasons), Rutgers (3 seasons), Arizona (2 seasons), and Louisville (1 season). For schools that moved laterally into BCS conferences - former SWC teams, former major independents - all seasons were counted.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
The First Level of Frustration: Contending But Not Winning

The problem with Ohio State hasn't been getting close, but rather with winning the proverbial cigar. As mentioned above, the Buckeyes have won only two national titles in the past forty years, even though they had seventeen eighty-plus seasons during that time. In other words, the Buckeyes' ability to "close the deal" in contending seasons is just 2 out of 17 (.118 percentage). Of course, we should always expect to have mores "closes" than "cigars", but Ohio State seems to have come up on the losing end of the equation more often than most teams. Do the numbers bear out that assumption, or do fans of other programs share our heartache in equal measure? Below is a list of all teams that have won at least one national championship in the past forty years, together with a few other major programs that have been shut out during that time, with the number of eighty-plus seasons followed by the number of titles and the year in which each title was won[sup]1[/sup].
Nebraska................21 seasons, 5 titles (1970, 1971, 1994, 1995, 1997)
Penn State.............18 seasons, 2 titles (1982, 1986)
Florida State...........17 seasons, 2 titles (1993, 1999)
Ohio State.............17 seasons, 2 titles (1968, 2002)
Michigan.................17 seasons, 1 title (1997)
Oklahoma................16 seasons, 4 titles (1974, 1975, 1985, 2000)
Miami.....................15 seasons, 5 titles (1983, 1987, 1989, 1991, 2001)
Southern Cal...........14 seasons, 5 titles (1972, 1974, 1978, 2003, 2004)
Alabama.................14 seasons, 3 titles (1978, 1979, 1992)[sup]2[/sup]
Texas....................14 seasons, 2 titles (1969, 2005)[sup]3[/sup]
Tennessee..............13 seasons, 1 title (1998)
Auburn...................13 seasons, 0 titles
Georgia..................12 seasons, 1 title (1980)
Florida...................12 seasons, 2 titles (1996, 2006)
Notre Dame..............9 seasons, 3 titles (1973, 1977, 1988)
Arkansas..................9 seasons, 0 titles
UCLA.......................9 seasons, 0 titles
Washington..............8 seasons, 1 title (1991)
Clemson...................8 seasons, 1 title (1981)
Louisiana State.........7 seasons, 2 titles (2003, 2007)
Colorado..................6 seasons, 1 title (1990)
Pittsburgh................4 seasons, 1 title (1976)
Georgia Tech............2 seasons, 1 title (1990)
Brigham Young..........0 seasons, 1 title (1984)[sup]4[/sup]
From the above, it is pretty clear that Ohio State fans have suffered more than their fair share of misery and disappointment over the years, as our team has often been in contention but has rarely earned a national championship for its efforts. I have taken the teams listed above and reorganized them by their ability to "close the deal" when a title is on the line; the percentage set forth beside each team represents the number of national championships won divided by the number of years in contention for a national championship (that is, eighty-plus seasons):
Brigham Young.......... inf. (1 title, 0 eighty-plus seasons)
Georgia Tech........... .500 (1 title, 2 eighty-plus seasons)
Southern Cal........... .357 (5 titles, 14 eighty-plus seasons)
Miami..................... .333 (5 titles, 15 eighty-plus seasons)
Notre Dame............. .333 (3 titles, 9 eighty-plus seasons)
Louisiana State........ .286 (2 titles, 7 eighty-plus seasons)
Oklahoma............... .250 (4 titles, 16 eighty-plus seasons)
Pittsburgh............... .250 (1 title, 4 eighty-plus seasons)
Nebraska................ .238 (5 titles, 21 eighty-plus seasons)
Alabama................. .214 (3 titles, 14 eighty-plus seasons)
Florida................... .167 (2 titles, 12 eighty-plus seasons)
Colorado................. .167 (1 title, 6 eighty-plus seasons)
Texas.................... .143 (2 titles, 14 eighty-plus seasons)
Washington............. .125 (1 title, 8 eighty-plus seasons)
Clemson................. .125 (1 title, 8 eighty-plus seasons)
Florida State........... .118 (2 titles, 17 eighty-plus seasons)
Ohio State............. .118 (2 titles, 17 eighty-plus seasons)
Penn State............. .111 (2 titles, 18 eighty-plus seasons)
Georgia.................. .083 (1 title, 12 eighty-plus seasons)
Tennessee.............. .077 (1 title, 13 eighty-plus seasons)
Michigan................. .059 (1 title, 17 eighty-plus seasons)
All other teams........ .000 (0 titles, 119 eighty-plus seasons)​
If we throw Brigham Young, Georgia Tech, and Pittsburgh out of the mix as teams that basically "got lucky" one year, we are left with 43 championships (including "split" titles) out of 286 contending seasons, for an average "closing the deal" percentage of .173 overall; in looking at the numbers in another way, every season (on average) six teams will compete for a national championship, and one will come away victorious. Using the .173 percentage as a benchmark, we find that a handful of elite programs have consistently capitalized on their national championship chances. Southern Cal, Miami, Notre Dame, Louisiana State, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Alabama have all won multiple titles in the past forty years (an average of 3.86 titles per team), and each has a "closing the deal" percentage of greater than twenty percent (an average of .281 per team). The rest of the championship teams - Ohio State included - has each won two titles or less (an average of 1.45 titles per team), and all have "closing the deal" percentages of less than twenty percent (an average of .105 per team)[sup]5[/sup].

So, it seems that the teams naturally break down into four categories: (1) teams that peform better than average when in national title contention; (2) teams that peform average or worse when in national title contention; (3) teams that are generally not in contention, but have won "lucky" titles; and of course (4) teams that don't win national titles, even when they are in contention.
___________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] With a few exceptions noted below, a team gets credit for each year in which it won either the AP title, the coaches' title, or both; thus, a "split" championship counts as a full championship, but a team does not get "extra credit" for a consensus title. Minor titles, even when "recognized" by the NCAA, have not be counted.
[sup]2[/sup] I have not counted Alabama's pre-bowl UPI title in 1973, as the Crimson Tide lost to Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl that season; for the purposes of this article, Notre Dame is considered to be the sole champion for 1973.
[sup]3[/sup] I have not counted Texas's pre-bowl UPI title in 1970, as the Longhorns lost to Notre Dame in the Cotton Bowl that season; for the purposes of this article, Nebraska is considered to be the sole champion for 1970.
[sup]4[/sup] Brigham Young has never been a member of a BCS conference, but they have had "eighty-plus" seasons ten times since 1968, including their 1984 championship season (13-0-0).
[sup]5[/sup] When all of the non-championship teams are factored into the equation, the titles per team drops to 0.286, and the "closing the deal" percentage falls to .061, which means that Ohio State does well relative to all BCS teams, but poorly when compared only to other "elite" teams.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
The Second Level of Frustration: Failures with a Title on the Line

So here's what we can conclude about the Ohio State Buckeye football team so far: (1) over the past forty years, they have been one of the top teams in the country in terms of competing for national championships, with seventeen eighty-plus seasons; (2) despite their overall success, they have under-performed in terms of winning championships, as they have earned only two national titles during that time; and thus (3) the high level of overall success combined with the inability to "close the deal" has led to mega-doses of frustration for us poor fans. But wait, it gets worse....

The Bowl Championship System (BCS) system was instituted in 1998. The main purpose of the BCS was to create one true national title game, the winner of which would be the indisputable champion of college football for that season. Although there has been quite a bit of controversy concerning the selection of the two title game participants, at least the BCS has largely avoided the split championships and voter biases that prevailed prior to its inauguration.

Before 1998, the national champion of college football was determined exclusively by pollsters - football writers and football coaches - who were allegedly experts in the field ... but who were in reality far more clueless than the average fan. And of course, pollsters were biased in favor of certain teams to begin with, and they were easily swayed by impressive highlights and lopsided scores. To make matters worse, most of the bowl games had conference affiliations, so that the two "best" teams were rarely matched up in a post-season contest.

For example, in both 1994 and 1997, Nebraska was awarded a national championship, even though they avoided playing the best-available opponent in a bowl match-up. In each of those seasons, the Cornhuskers beat inferior opponents in the Orange Bowl (the Big 8/12 tie-in game), while the undefeated Big Ten champs (Penn State and Michigan, respectively) were stuck playing equally inferior opponents in the Rose Bowl. At the end of the day, the pollsters had the final say - despite matching Nebraska's perfection, Penn State was shut out by the voters in 1994, and Michigan managed only a split (AP) title in 1997. A BCS-type championship game would have come in handy in both seasons, as the two best teams would have been paired in a true title game.

Despite the inconsistencies and inadequacies of the pre-BCS system[sup]1[/sup], most of the time the voters were able to crown a consensus national champion who, in retrospect, really deserved the title. However, because there was no authorized national championship game, sometimes several bowls had to be played before a champion could be determined. For example, in 1970, there were three bowl games that had national champsionship implications. Heading into bowl week, Texas had already won the UPI title[sup]2[/sup], and they were sitting atop the AP poll as well. All that Texas needed to do in order to secure a consensus national championship was to beat Notre Dame in the Cotton Bowl, but the Longhorns lost in decisive fashion, 24-11, thus eliminating themselves from the AP title hunt. The number two team in the AP poll was Ohio State[sup]3[/sup], who was trying to preserve a perfect season in the Rose Bowl. If the Buckeyes had won that game, then they would have been the AP champs for 1970 ... but alas, in one of the greatest upsets in Ohio State history, the Buckeyes fell to Stanford by a score of 27-17. The unexpected losses by Texas and Ohio State opened the door for #3 Nebraska, who defeated Louisiana State in the Orange Bowl to finish their season 11-0-1, which was good enough to earn the AP title that year.

Ironically, a fourth game impacted the national championship selection process in 1970. That year, both #5 Ohio State and #4 Michigan entered The Game with perfect records. Ohio State won by the score of 20-9 and earned a trip to the Rose Bowl, where they lost to Stanford (see above). In 1970, the Big Ten still had some archaic rules in place, namely (1) that the Rose Bowl was the only bowl game for which conference teams were eligible, and (2) a Big Ten team could not go to the Rose Bowl in consecutive seasons. Because Michigan had gone to the Rose Bowl in 1969, the "no other bowls" and "no repeat" rules meant that The Game was Michigan's season finale, win, lose, or draw. If the Wolverines would have beaten Ohio State, then they would have finished their season with a 10-0-0 record and an impressive win on the road over a highly-ranked opponent in a rivalry game. All of that, combined with the Texas loss in the Cotton Bowl, might have allowed Michigan to back into the AP title ahead of Nebraska, who had a narrow 17-12 win in the Orange Bowl.

Thus, in a sense, there were at least three, and possibly four, national championship games in 1970, but there would have been only one if the top-ranked Longhorns had taken care of business ... or two, if the Buckeyes had taken care of theirs. However, the situation in 1970 was not unique, and during several other seasons the results of two or more bowl games (or other season-ending games[sup]4[/sup]) had an impact on the national title selection process. In retrospect, it is sometimes difficult to determine which contests were actually "national championship games", but I have done my best to traverse the Byzantine alleys of the college football world in search of answers, and here is my conclusion: Ohio State has a miserable record in national championship games.

Since 1968, there has been a grand total of forty-six college football national champions, including split titles[sup]5[/sup]. In the list below, I have set forth all teams that have played for a national championship from 1968 to 2007, followed by their record in national championship games; their winning percentage in such games; and the years in which they participated in such games, with bold type indicating a victory.
Notre Dame......... 3-0 (1.000) (1973, 1977, 1988)
Penn State.......... 2-0 (1.000) (1982, 1986)
Louisiana State.... 2-0 (1.000) (2003, 2007)
Pittsburgh........... 1-0 (1.000) (1976)
Clemson.............. 1-0 (1.000) (1981)
Brigham Young...... 1-0 (1.000) (1984)
Georgia Tech........ 1-0 (1.000) (1990)
Washington.......... 1-0 (1.000) (1991)
Tennessee........... 1-0 (1.000) (1998)
Southern Cal........ 5-2 (.714) (1968, 1972, 1974, 1978, 2003, 2004, 2005)
Florida................ 2-1 (.667) (1995, 1996, 2006)
Nebraska............. 5-3 (.625) (1970, 1971, 1983, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, 2001)
Miami.................. 5-3 (.625) (1983, 1986, 1987, 1989, 1991, 1992, 2001, 2002)
Oklahoma............ 4-3 (.571) (1974, 1975, 1985, 1987, 2000, 2003, 2004)
Michigan............. 1-1 (.500) (1970, 1997)[sup]6[/sup]
Colorado............. 1-1 (.500) (1989, 1990)
Alabama............. 3-4 (.429) (1971, 1973, 1974, 1978, 1979, 1989, 1992)
Florida State....... 2-3 (.400) (1993, 1996, 1998, 1999, 2000)
Texas................ 2-4 (.333) (1969, 1970, 1977, 1983, 1990, 2005)
Georgia.............. 1-2 (.333) (1976, 1980, 1982)
Ohio State......... 2-8 (.200) (1968, 1969, 1970, 1972, 1974, 1975, 1979, 2002, 2006, 2007)
Texas A+M.......... 0-1 (.000) (1992)
Arizona State...... 0-1 (.000) (1996)
Virginia Tech....... 0-1 (.000) (1999)
West Virginia....... 0-2 (.000) (1988, 1993)​

So, in the past forty years, Ohio State has had seventeen eighty-plus seasons but only two recognized national championships. This is frustrating. But it is even more frustrating to realize that in over half of those eighty-plus seasons, Ohio State actually played in some sort of national championship game, and that they still managed to take home the brass ring just twice. If the Buckeyes would have had just average success in national championship games, then we fans would have two or three more titles to brag about right now.
____________________________________________
[sup]1[/sup] The purpose of this article is not to praise the BCS system, which has plenty of inconsistencies and inadequacies of its own. However, it is certainly a better system than the non-system that was previously in place.
[sup]2[/sup] In 1970, UPI named its national championship prior to the bowl games.
[sup]3[/sup] The Buckeyes earned the NFF national championship in 1970, which was awarded prior to the bowl games. Although the NCAA and Ohio State recognize this title, most football experts and fans do not because: (a) it is a "minor" title, and (b) it was awarded prior to the Buckeyes' loss in the Rose Bowl.
[sup]4[/sup] On occasion and for various reasons, a contending team would sometimes not be invited to a bowl game, or would refuse to accept a bowl bid.
[sup]5[/sup] In 1970, UPI awarded its pre-bowl national championship to Texas, and in 1973 to Alabama. Both teams lost their respective bowl games, and thus I have not counted those titles in the list above; in fact, I have counted each as a national championship loss.
[sup]6[/sup] Michigan also had final game losses in 1971, 1972, 1977, and 1978 that may have - but probably did not - cost them national championships.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Recapping Frustration: A Brief Look at the Buckeyes' Title Game Losses

Ohio State has lost an unprecedented seven national championship games since 1968, and some of these have been truly bewildering or heartbreaking.

The 1969 Buckeyes were riding a 22-game winning streak when they entered The Game. Because the defending national champions had annihilated Michigan the prior season by the score of 50-14, it was generally considered that Ohio State would again win in a romp. However, the 17-point underdog Wolverines, led by rookie coach Bo Schembechler, pulled off the stunning upset. Prior to that fateful trip to Ann Arbor, Ohio State had outscored its opponents by an average of 46 to 8, but the Wolverines managed to put up 24 points while holding the Buckeyes to just 12. Because of the Big Ten's "no repeat" rule, The Game was Ohio State's last contest of the season, and a victory would have given the top-ranked Buckeyes a second straight national championship.

Entering the 1970 season, the Buckeyes, led by former "Super Sophs" Rex Kern, Jack Tatum, Jim Stillwagon, Jan White, Leo Hayden, and Mike Sensibaugh, were generally considered to be the best team in the land. However, some less than impressive late season victories had caused Ohio State to slip behind Texas in both major polls. Although the UPI awarded the Longhorns a pre-bowl national championship that year, Ohio State still had a chance to back into the AP title if Texas lost in the Cotton Bowl. And Texas did lose, but Ohio State failed to capitalize on that golden opportunity. Matched up against an 8-3 Stanford team in the Rose Bowl, Ohio State was leading 17-13 at the beginning of the fourth quarter. Facing a fourth and inches at Stanford's 19-yard line, the Buckeyes went for the first down but failed to convert. That play broke the Buckeyes' collective spirit, and Stanford went on to score fourteen unanswered points to win the game going away.

In 1972, the Buckeyes lost to underdog Michigan State, but still finished the regular season with a 9-1 record and a Big Ten championship (thanks to a 14-11 win over previously unbeaten Michigan - a little does of frustration for the Wolverines!). As a reward, Ohio State got the opportunity to play Southern Cal in the Rose Bowl. The 1972 Trojans are generally considered one of the best football teams of all time, and they easily rolled the #3 Buckeyes, 42-17 to complete a perfect season and earn a consensus national championship. However, a win by the Buckeyes over the #1 team in the nation would have most likely vaulted them into the top spot in both polls.

The 1974 Buckeyes once again lost a stunning and controversial game to Michigan State, but still finished the regular season at 10-1 and held the number three spot in the UPI poll. Although it looked like the Buckeyes had no chance at a national title, undefeated Oklahoma (the AP champ) was on probation and thus ineligible for the UPI title, and previously unbeaten Alabama (#1 in the UPI poll) lost to Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl. As things turned out, the Rose Bowl, featuring Ohio State and Southern Cal, would be the UPI championship game, with the winner earning the coaches' title. Ohio State led the game 17-10 late in the fourth quarter, but Southern Cal scored a touchdown with just over two minutes remaining, and then added a two-point conversion to take the lead. Although the Buckeyes would get one last shot to win the game, their final drive fell short and the Trojans came away with an 18-17 victory and the UPI national championship for the 1974 season.

In 1975, the Buckeyes simply rolled through their regular season schedule, beating their opponents by an average score of 34-7 en route to a perfect 11-0-0 record and the top spot in both polls. Once again, the Buckeyes would travel to that house of horrors known as the Rose Bowl to face a heavy underdog. This time their opponent would be the UCLA Bruins, whom the Buckeyes had already beaten during the regular season, in Los Angeles, by the score of 41-20. However, the Bruins simply overwhelmed the Buckeyes in the re-match, winning the contest by the score of 23-10. Oklahoma, who had lost to Kansas 23-3 late in the season, beat Michigan in the Orange Bowl to win a consensus national championship. Although both teams had identical 11-1-0 records and an ugly loss to an inferior opponent, the Buckeyes' collapse came at the wrong time and in the wrong place, and it cost us another national title.

The 1978 season was one of the worst in Buckeye football - Ohio State finished with a mediocre 7-4-1 record, lost a third straight Game to Michigan, and fell to an unheralded Clemson team in the Gator Bowl. However, the real nadir occurred late in that Gator Bowl game, when Buckeye legendary head coach Woody Hayes threw a punch at a Clemson player; Hayes was fired the next morning. With a rookie head coach (Earle Bruce), a young quarterback (Art Schlichter), and a program perceived to be in disarray and decline, the Buckeyes were not expected to do much during the 1979 season, and they entered the campaign unranked. But the team quickly came together, and after a perfect regular season, Ohio State was the number one team in the country. Once again, the Buckeyes played Southern Cal in the Rose Bowl, and once again they gave up a late touchdown to once again lose by one point, 17-16. A truly heartbreaking loss, especially in retrospect, as the Buckeyes would not be a true national title contender for another fourteen years.

The recent title game losses are still fresh in our memories, but here's a brief recap to emphasize that frustration you are undoubtedly feeling right now. In 2006, the Buckeyes beat #2 Texas on the road, #2 Michigan at home, and everybody else on their schedule to finish the regular season at 12-0. Ohio State was heavily favored in the BCS title game, but the Florida Gators rolled to a 41-14 victory against a Buckeye team that never really showed up. The 2007 Buckeyes suffered a late season loss to Illinois, but they were able to get back to the championship game when every other team ahead of them also lost going down the stretch. However, the end result wasn't very different, as Ohio State fell to Louisiana State by the score of 38-24.

So there you have it - eight great seasons, each marred by one untimely, unfortunate, sometimes heartbreaking, sometimes ugly defeat. And eight national championships down the drain....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Another Kind of Frustration: Losing the Rivalry Game

As mentioned above, Michigan's upset victory in the 1969 version of The Game cost Ohio State a consensus national championship. However, on five other occasions, a Buckeye loss (or tie) in the annual rivalry game took them out of title contention. In 1973, the unbeaten Buckeyes traveled to Ann Arbor to face the unbeaten Wolverines in one of the most closely matched battles in the history of the rivalry. To an outside observer, the end result - a 10-10 tie - was fitting, but it cost each team a chance at a national championship, as both Notre Dame and Alabama finished the regular season with perfect records and bids to the Sugar Bowl; Notre Dame won that game in dramatic fashion, 24-23, and took home the AP title[sup]1[/sup]. Meanwhile, the Buckeyes went to the Rose Bowl and turned in their greatest performance ever in that game, waxing the Southern Cal Trojans by the score of 42-21 ... but that blow-out on hostile soil wasn't enough to overcome the tie in The Game, and Ohio State finished second in the AP poll despite having a nearly-perfect 10-0-1 record.

John Cooper's legacy at Ohio State will always be this: 2-10-1, which of course was his record against Michigan. Three times, Coach Cooper entered The Game undefeated and with a chance at a national championship, and each time his team lost: in 1993, the Buckeyes were shut out, 28-0, in a game that wasn't even that close; in 1995, Eddie George, Terry Glenn, Orlando Pace, and Bobby Hoying couldn't match the offensive firepower of Tim Biakabatuka, who rushed for 313 yards in the Wolverines' 31-23 victory; and in 1996, Shawn Springs slipped in single coverage, and Tai Streets caught a short slant pass and raced 68 yards for the only touchdown in a 13-9 contest.

Unlike his predecessor, Jim Tressel's legacy is being built on his success in The Game, where he currently enjoys a 7-1 record against That Team Up North. However, Tressel's only loss to date was in the 2003 contest, which eliminated the Buckeyes from the national title race[sup]2[/sup].

Although we like to think that all of the bad luck in The Game belongs to us, our Buckeyes have crushed the Wolverines' title hopes on many occasions as well. In 1970, 1972, 1973, and 1974, Michigan's only blemish of the season came at the hands of Ohio State, and each loss (or tie in the case of 1973) not only ended the Wolverines' chances for a national championship, but also prevented them being invited to a bowl game. In addition, Ohio State ended Michigan's perfect season in 2006 with a 42-39 triumph in The Game.

While Ohio State and Michigan have a long history of raining on each other's parade, the Florida State Seminoles have had far worse luck in rivalry games than either of the Big Ten powers. From 1987 to 2000, the Seminoles finished in the top 5 of the AP poll a record fourteen consecutive times, winning two consensus national titles along the way. However, Florida State had many more chances during its incredible run, but losses to their in-state rivals, Florida and Miami, cost them seven more championships: 1987 (11-1-0; lost to Miami, 26-25); 1988 (11-1-0; lost to Miami, 31-0); 1991 (11-2-0; lost to Miami, 17-16; lost to Florida, 14-9); 1992 (11-1-0; lost to Miami, 19-16); 1994 (10-1-1; lost to Miami, 34-20; tied Florida, 31-31); 1996 (11-1-0; lost to Florida, 52-20, in national championship game); and 1997 (11-1-0; lost to Florida, 32-29). Now that is about as frustrating as you can get ... but Florida State's misery doesn't do anything to relieve our pain.
______________________________
[sup]1[/sup] Alabama won the pre-bowl UPI title in 1973, so Ohio State's monumental victory in the Rose Bowl had no effect on the outcome of that poll.
[sup]2[/sup] Ironically, in 1973, 1996, 1998, and 2003, the Buckeyes rebounded from their setbacks in The Game and won their subsequent bowl match-ups. But even those big victories on the big stages were not enough to propel Ohio State back to the top of the college football world, as the Buckeyes finished in second place in the AP poll in 1973, 1996, and 1998, and fourth in 2003.
 
Upvote 0
Another Kind of Frustration: Being Ignored by the Pollsters

Because Ohio State has played in nine national championship games in the last forty years, it's pretty hard to claim that the Buckeyes have been overlooked by biased, uninformed, or just plain lazy pollsters. However, at least four times since 1968, Ohio State has had arguably the best team in the land, but has been out-voted by other teams in the national polls.

In 1973, Ohio State won its first nine games handily, played one of the best-ever Michigan squads to a draw on the road, and then slaughtered defending national champion Southern Cal in the Rose Bowl. Notre Dame preserved its perfect record by eking out a one-point victory over Alabama in the Sugar Bowl. The AP pollsters voted Notre Dame as the best team in the nation, and placed Ohio State second, even though the Buckeyes were quite possibly the better team based on their respective bowl performances.

In 1975, Ohio State and Oklahoma each lost one game to an inferior opponent, but the Buckeyes' loss came in the Rose Bowl, and the Sooners' happened during the regular season. Based on the "what have you done for me lately" theory, Oklahoma took home a consensus national title in 1975, despite finishing the season with a record identical to Ohio State's. The Buckeyes finished in fourth place in both the AP and UPI polls.

In 1996, Ohio State lost its regular season finale to Michigan by just four points on a fluke play, yet still earned a trip to the Rose Bowl to face an undefeated Arizona State squad; the Buckeyes won that game to finish the season at 11-1-0. However, the pollsters voted Florida as the national champion, after the Gators defeated the previously unbeaten Florida State Seminoles in the Sugar Bowl, this despite the fact that the Gators had lost to the Seminoles during the regular season. Once again, the Buckeyes finished in second place in both major polls.

The 1998 season marked the beginning of the BCS system. Ohio State suffered a freakish loss to Michigan State that year, but finished strong with a rare Cooper-era victory over Michigan. Although Ohio State and Florida State each had only one loss, and despite the fact that Ohio State had the "better" loss, the pollsters voted the Seminoles into the title game against the unbeaten Tennessee Volunteers. Capping off a miracle season, the Vols beat the 'Noles in the Fiesta Bowl, while Ohio State topped Texas A+M in the Sugar Bowl. The voters properly voted Tennessee as the number one team in the country ... but should Ohio State have been voted into the title game in place of Florida State ... and could they have knocked off a team that ended the season with a perfect 13-0-0 record? Who can say at this point, but many of us Buckeye fans still feel that our team was screwed out of a shot at a national championship, and once again had to settle for second place because of a bunch of biased voters.

While we still have reason to cry foul when it comes to pollsters, Penn State fans perhaps have even more reason to bitch and complain. Since 1968, the Nittany Lions have had five perfect seasons (1968, 1969, 1973, 1986, and 1994), but have only one national championship (1986) to show for it (although they did also win a title in 1982 with a one-loss team). In the early years, Penn State's accomplishments were downgraded because the Lions did not play in a conference, and their independent schedule consisted primarily of East Coast cupcakes such as Army, Navy, Maryland, West Virginia, and Syracuse. However, the Nits are still fuming about the 1994 season, in which their team rolled through their Big Ten schedule, crushed Oregon in the Rose Bowl, racked up a grand total of 564 points (47.0 per game), and posted a perfect 12-0-0 record, yet got snubbed by the pollsters in favor of a chic Nebraska team.

The Auburn Tigers have had similar bad luck when it comes to pollsters, if not quite to the same degree. In both 1993[sup]1[/sup] and 2003, Auburn posted perfect seasons only to see the voters select someone else as the national champion (Florida State in 1993, Southern Cal in 2003). In 1983, the Tigers entered the Sugar Bowl as the number three team in the country, behind #1 Nebraska and #2 Texas. Although both the Huskers and the Horns lost their respective bowl games, and the War Eagles won theirs, Auburn remained stuck in third place as #5 Miami, the winner of the Orange Bowl, rocketed to the top of the poll, and Nebraska, the Orange Bowl loser, dropped only one place.

But hey, Auburn's and Penn State's sorrows are no concern of ours ... we've got frustrations of our own to worry about.
______________________________
[sup]1[/sup] In 1993, Auburn was on probation and thus was not eligible for a bowl game or to be ranked in the coaches' (UPI) poll. These issues presumably factored into the AP voters' decision to place Auburn fourth in their final poll, behind one-loss teams from Florida State, Notre Dame, and Nebraska.
 
Upvote 0
A Summary of Buckeye Frustrations

So there you have it. The Buckeyes are very good - maybe even the best - when it comes to getting close ... but they very bad - maybe even the worst - when it comes to making it all the way to the top. The facts don't lie: In the past forty seasons, Ohio State has had seventeen "eighty-plus" seasons and has played in a national championship game nine times, but the Buckeyes have only two generally recognized national titles to show for it. That distinct lack of success can be blamed on any number of things - overconfidence, folding under pressure, bad luck, inadequate preparation, having an off day, questionable calls, media bias, maybe even being not quite good enough - but it really doesn't matter in the long run. We are fans. We aren't looking for answers, we just want to win. And because we are good, we expect to win. And because we are great, we deserve to win. And when we don't win, we get frustrated. Yeah, we can brag about all of those Heismans and Maxwells and Lombardis and Outlands ... we can make an All-American team that goes five deep at almost every position ... we can claim a whole bunch of minor national title recognitions by organizations with self-important names such as the National Championship Foundation, or the National Football Foundation and Hall of Fame, or even The Foundation for the Analysis of Competitions and Tournaments ... and of course we can go on from dawn till dusk about how we got screwed a thousand and one different ways....

But in the end, we know that it's all about winning, and we realize that we simply haven't won enough ... and that pisses us off. Even if our guys tried their hardest ... even if they left it all out on the field ... even if they played with class ... even if they got a bad break along the way ... even if they bleed scarlet and grey ... even if they got beat by a better team ... it still doesn't matter. We still lost. And losing is never good enough ... because we are fans ... and we just don't get it.

Wait until next year. And be prepared to be frustrated. Again.
 
Upvote 0
eek2.gif
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top