• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Who is the GREATEST baseball player ever?

Jump to latest Follow Reply

Who is the best OVERALL baseball player ever?

  • Babe Ruth

    Votes: 32 59.3%

  • "Shoeless" Joe Jackson

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • Pete Rose

    Votes: 7 13.0%

  • Ted Williams

    Votes: 2 3.7%

  • Other-----Please explain your selection

    Votes: 12 22.2%
  • Total voters
    54
Sort by date Sort by votes
buckeyeboy;797325; said:
Ruth didn't play center. Comparing left or right to center is as ridiculous as comparing second base to center IMO.
Click to expand...

Hey, you said Ruth was a terrible fielder and I showed you he wasn't.

You didn't come back with the position argument until I showed you they had similar stats.
 
Upvote 0
Thump;797326; said:
Hey, you said Ruth was a terrible fielder and I showed you he wasn't.

You didn't come back with the position argument until I showed you they had similar stats.
Click to expand...

I'd imagine that Ruth's career fielding % of .961 is nothing to brag about when it comes to non-centerfield outfielders.
 
Upvote 0
Thump;797323; said:
We're comparing outfielders.

The best way to compare is stats.
Click to expand...

To also measure outfielders, I'd recommend taking a look at putouts per full outfield season.

Mays played 2842 games in the outfield, and made 7095 putouts (ML record).
Ruth played 2130 games in the outfield, and made 4222 putouts.

So Mays would get 384 outs per 154-game season, and Ruth would get 305. Almost 80 outs a year is a huge difference.
 
Upvote 0
BB73;797331; said:
To also measure outfielders, I'd recommend taking a look at putouts per full outfield season.

Mays played 2842 games in the outfield, and made 7095 putouts (ML record).
Ruth played 2130 games in the outfield, and made 4222 putouts.

So Mays would get 384 outs per 154-game season, and Ruth would get 305. Almost 80 outs a year is a huge difference.
Click to expand...

How many of those would be attributed to the difference in position? A centerfielder SHOULD make more plays than a corner-outfielder.
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;797335; said:
How many of those would be attributed to the difference in position? A centerfielder SHOULD make more plays than a corner-outfielder.
Click to expand...

That's true, but Mays' total is the career record for all outfielders.

I don't know the average putouts in a season for a CF and a LF/RF. Where's Bill James?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
BB73;797338; said:
That's true, but Mays' total is the career record for all outfielders.

I don't know the average putouts in a season for a CF and a LF. Where's Bill James?
Click to expand...

So we know Mays was a helluve good centerfielder. In other gnu's....:biggrin:

Which makes comparing Ruth's defense to Mays's defense even less meaningful, IMO. There's no real basis for comparison or perspective.

Who would be considered an "average" outfielder of Ruth's era?
 
Upvote 0
Bucky Katt;797342; said:
So we know Mays was a helluve good centerfielder. In other gnu's....:biggrin:

Which makes comparing Ruth's defense to Mays's defense even less meaningful, IMO. There's no real basis for comparison or perspective.

Who would be considered an "average" outfielder of Ruth's era?
Click to expand...

I don't really know. And I'm not interested enough to calculate the average LF/RF putouts in Ruth's era and the average CF putouts in the Mays era.

But getting 20 more putouts in a year would seem to have the same value as getting 20 more hits in a year, which should be worth at least .030 on a batting average, and thus very significant.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Babe Ruth-he could easily have made the Hall of Fame as a pitcher if he had pitched for his entire career. In addition, he might have been the best average/power combo ever-only Ted Williams was even close-Ruth hit .356 in 1927, the year he hit 60 home runs.
 
Upvote 0
Dryden said:
Babe Ruth, and it's not even close. Ruth dominated his contemporaries as both a pitcher and a hitter. He had single seasons where he was hitting more HRs than entire teams.
Click to expand...
True, it's Ruth hands down, not even close. Unless, you take into account what Ted Williams would have done had WWII never taken place. Because of the war Williams essentially missed his prime. The year before he shipped off he won the Triple Crown, and the second year he was back ('47) he won it again. If you average his Triple crown years together and multiple them by the number of years he missed, which I think is fair he could have put up better numbers, Williams ranks 1st alltime in Runs Scored, RBI's, and walks. He ranks 4th in Homers, 5th in doubles, 9th in hits, and probably would have raised his career average to around .350ish which would put him 4th. Pretty good argument, I think.
 
Upvote 0
Ruth did have some advantadges at the plate.

With another HOF batting in front of him he got more pitches to hit.

IMO, Ruth was the best and greatest player. Baseball was coming off the Black Sox scandal and was in serious trouble when Ruth came along and filled the parks, filled the papers, and kept the sport alive.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top