• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

What do you think of cookie cutter housing developments?

Back on topic (sort of) The proliferation of cash advance businesses is a pet peeve of mine. How hard is it to realize that you are living beyond your means when you have to go to one every month?

Oh, don't get me started on those.... I know people who go to one to pay off another. I don't know how that 'business' isn't considered usury.

(Oh, and the topic was cookie-cutter homes, so we're still off... :) )
 
Upvote 0
Looks like 10-15% to get an advance, from glancing at a few sites.

And I live in a relatively cookie-cutter home. But at least it didn't have to be beige. It could be white, beige, off-white, or light gray. :biggrin:

Our development at least plants a good number of trees, so it should be somewhat wooded once they grow a bit.
 
Upvote 0
Agreed. Why would I look for an argument this week anyway? We have a common enemy. :biggrin:

Kbuck (or anyone who knows) - perhaps you can enlighten me. I know that many of these loans are FHA loans, something about which I admittedly know little - how does that affect the approval process or the mortgage requirements. If these loans are federally insured, what impact does the rash of foreclosures have on the greater economy? What is the source of the federal funds that back these loans?

Okay... yeah... FHA loans are loans that are designed to encourage home ownership that are insured by the FHA (think HUD, because there are some other agencies involved but HUD runs them all, more or less). Anyway, theses are the ones that require (with no help from elsewhere) a 3% downpayment. But the difference bewtween these and "Conventional" Loans are that the down payment is actually an insurance payment that protects against foreclosures. So you pay 103K for a 100K house.

They are a little easier to get than conventionals (the 3%) being aimed at first time home buyers, but the interest rate is usually a little more than a conventional.

Now, in theory... what would happen (to really simplify thing) is when foreclosures happen the mortgage company that holds the loan gains control of the property, bills HUD for the expenses and gives the property to HUD, who then liquidates it (Through a number of avenues, most commonly a realtor, "HUD Homes" are something different).

So, I'd say on average, the loss from a HUD Foreclosure on a 100K property would be, in Ohio maybe 20K for all the expenses (Providing the mortgagoe didn't pillage the property or something)... now theorehtically the 3% is supposed to cover it... but like any actuarial type estimate, it can blow up, so it could end up costing the tax payers.

Conventional loans are the same with the exception that instead of the governmetn funding the loan (or insuring the note) a private entity provides the funds (like Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or Bob's Bank) and rather than an up front insurance premium you buy Private Mortgage insurance which you are usually required to carrry until you have and 80/20 LTV.. (An 80K or less balance on a 100K loan).
 
Upvote 0
Thanks, K. That's a good overview. I'll have to find some reading material to further educate myself on the subject.

For now, I'm trying to figure out how a thread started by Thump turned into somewhat meaningful discussion... :huh:
 
Upvote 0
BK, what have I done to deserve such scorn?

Scorn? What scorn? Or is that "What's corn?" IIRC, it is a vegetable not dissimilar to maize. Which is a color commonly associated with a certain "football team". I, of course, use the term "football team" very loosely here. What a bunch of ballet-dancing, figure-skating, man-purse-carrying, capri pants-wearing pansies!

I'm sorry. I didn't mean to scorn you. Lo siento, Senor Mojo.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top