The Buckeyes won the only previous meeting, a 38-12 decision in Columbus in 2015.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Didn't this game get scheduled somewhat at the last minute because somebody else backed out of the date?Why are we lining the coffers of schools not from Ohio? Fuck these pricks.
Didn't this game get scheduled somewhat at the last minute because somebody else backed out of the date?
"Similar caliber of defense"... Western Michigan had a similar caliber of defense but a better offense, statistically, than Arkron a year ago.
...
So you’re saying we have a chance in this one?"Similar caliber of defense"
I might beg to differ with that guy's definition of "similar"
Akron allowed 5.18 yards per play last year. The Broncos allowed 6.11
That is a huge difference. Akron's number was good enough for 31st nationally. Western Michigan earned a ranking of 106.
Thirty First is not "similar" to One Hundred Sixth by any useful definition of the word.
By contrast, the writer called WMU's offense "better", not "similar".
The WMU offense was ranked 112th vs Akron's ranking of 131 last year. That's a heck of a lot closer to "similar" than the defensive difference, yet the writer seemed to think the opposite. How he came to that conclusion is anyone's guess.
Always bringing the truth."Similar caliber of defense"
I might beg to differ with that guy's definition of "similar"
Akron allowed 5.18 yards per play last year. The Broncos allowed 6.11
That is a huge difference. Akron's number was good enough for 31st nationally. Western Michigan earned a ranking of 106.
Thirty First is not "similar" to One Hundred Sixth by any useful definition of the word.
By contrast, the writer called WMU's offense "better", not "similar".
The WMU offense was ranked 112th vs Akron's ranking of 131 last year. That's a heck of a lot closer to "similar" than the defensive difference, yet the writer seemed to think the opposite. How he came to that conclusion is anyone's guess.