Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No offense intended, but we need to stop this nonsense. I am not opposed to Carter being Ohio State President. Best wishes to him. However, command responsibility for an aircraft carrier does not necessarily develop the skills necessary for a senior executive at Ohio State.But does he have a PhD?
His experience is largely with people who do not have the capacity to dissent or leave.
What the "here" you're referencing? (Just curious as its not clear to me)I started here when he was leaving, and I can say it got worse when he left. Carter took a lot of things off the Faculty's plate and let them cook, and Buck put most of it back on their plates.
This is a heaping pile of hyperbolic nonsense. A PhD is a fairly meaningless piece of paper and can never ever be a substitute for intelligence, wisdom, and experience. We are talking about a school that hired a biology teacher as President. Yeah, how did that work out? Anyway, Carter checks all the appropriate boxes of productive accomplishments, and without a hint of the bullshit ideologies and total embarrassment that the fancy pants Ivy League Presidents with their PhD’s and plagiarism put their respective Universities through.No offense intended, but we need to stop this nonsense. I am not opposed to Carter being Ohio State President. Best wishes to him. However, command responsibility for an aircraft carrier does not necessarily develop the skills necessary for a senior executive at Ohio State.
My concern, and it may be misplaced, is that four years at Nebraska would not be expected to prepare Carter for this challenge. In fact, Nebraska's rankings declined substantively during his time there, last year to below #800. According to the QS rankings, 5 South African universities amd 3 Egyptian universities rank above Nebraska in the World University rankings this year, and this is after Nebraska recovered some of the losses under Carter to a rank in the top 600.
Ohio State is a top 100 ranked university, with only the University of Cape Town at #165 comparable.
Universities at the level of Ohio State (and those at much lower levels) exist to develop new knowledge, often in collaboration with business, civil society, and government, so that it can be incorporated into educational programs and societal advancements. How does that look in practice?
An example of this would be the development of Columbus as a financial innovation hub during the last 60 years, in collaboration with new research that became the discipline of consumer behavior (now behavioral economics) at Fisher College of Business. The ATM, Visa card, electronic funds transfer at the point of sale, bank by phone, etc, the esteemed Journal of Finance attributed 27 of the top 30 banking innovations in the 20th century to banks headquartered in Columbus.
Bank One was the most profitable bank in America for many years and went from its beginning as City National Bank, the 4th place bank in Columbus, to become the #2 bank by market capitalization. Other beneficiaries were the Limited Stores, who became the fastest-growing and most profitable retailer in America. They convinced consumer behavior and marketing strategy prof David Kollat to join them as VP Marketing in the early 70s and developed that winning string of companies (Abercrombie and Fitch, Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, etc). Retail is detail and Fisher profs were intimately involved in the creation of those business models and retail environmental designs, based on the most recent consumer behavior findings. The Fisher CoB and its students also benefited from the interplay of those relations.
It takes about two decades to develop a professor who understands how to develop and publish such knowledge in the highest level journals. I have watched how many university presidents in Africa and Europe, who did not understand the difference between publishing in the highest level journals, saw the quality of their faculty decline, research dollars dry up, and student numbers drop--with incredibly bad outcomes for their universities that can take more than a generation to repair.
Carter is retirement age and this is likely to be his last job. His experience is largely with people who do not have the capacity to dissent or leave.
Right now, Carter is saying the things that any new leader says. Nod the head at a few programs for excellence, sing the school song with students, get around the campus. If President Carter fails to understand the core requirements of an internationally-respected research university, and small missteps can prove fatal in this regard, then things can go South very quickly. I am wondering how many leading scholars at Ohio State feel to learn that Trustees in the Talent, Compensation and Governance committee approved an amendment to the university's bylaws, making the provost "'the chief academic officer of the university' rather than chief operating officer". That seems like a plus to me, but does it have implications for funding, freedom to control one's research funding, changes to the academic structure, the attractiveness of the University to faculty and prospective leading PhD students, whatever, that might create recruiting challenges? I don't know. It's all in the details and that is why someone has to have an understanding of the requirements of a complex adaptive system, such as a public research university.
Time may tell that this is a home run hire. The point is that running a university is like herding cats, except some of those cats are sharks that simply can stand up and take a huge chunk of your reputational and research resources and staff with them. That's a dynamic one simply doesn't learn running an aircraft carrier.
No one is ever “Prepared” for the monster that is tOSU.No offense intended, but we need to stop this nonsense. I am not opposed to Carter being Ohio State President. Best wishes to him. However, command responsibility for an aircraft carrier does not necessarily develop the skills necessary for a senior executive at Ohio State.
My concern, and it may be misplaced, is that four years at Nebraska would not be expected to prepare Carter for this challenge. In fact, Nebraska's rankings declined substantively during his time there, last year to below #800. According to the QS rankings, 5 South African universities amd 3 Egyptian universities rank above Nebraska in the World University rankings this year, and this is after Nebraska recovered some of the losses under Carter to a rank in the top 600.
Ohio State is a top 100 ranked university, with only the University of Cape Town at #165 comparable.
Universities at the level of Ohio State (and those at much lower levels) exist to develop new knowledge, often in collaboration with business, civil society, and government, so that it can be incorporated into educational programs and societal advancements. How does that look in practice?
An example of this would be the development of Columbus as a financial innovation hub during the last 60 years, in collaboration with new research that became the discipline of consumer behavior (now behavioral economics) at Fisher College of Business. The ATM, Visa card, electronic funds transfer at the point of sale, bank by phone, etc, the esteemed Journal of Finance attributed 27 of the top 30 banking innovations in the 20th century to banks headquartered in Columbus.
Bank One was the most profitable bank in America for many years and went from its beginning as City National Bank, the 4th place bank in Columbus, to become the #2 bank by market capitalization. Other beneficiaries were the Limited Stores, who became the fastest-growing and most profitable retailer in America. They convinced consumer behavior and marketing strategy prof David Kollat to join them as VP Marketing in the early 70s and developed that winning string of companies (Abercrombie and Fitch, Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, etc). Retail is detail and Fisher profs were intimately involved in the creation of those business models and retail environmental designs, based on the most recent consumer behavior findings. The Fisher CoB and its students also benefited from the interplay of those relations.
It takes about two decades to develop a professor who understands how to develop and publish such knowledge in the highest level journals. I have watched how many university presidents in Africa and Europe, who did not understand the difference between publishing in the highest level journals, saw the quality of their faculty decline, research dollars dry up, and student numbers drop--with incredibly bad outcomes for their universities that can take more than a generation to repair.
Carter is retirement age and this is likely to be his last job. His experience is largely with people who do not have the capacity to dissent or leave.
Right now, Carter is saying the things that any new leader says. Nod the head at a few programs for excellence, sing the school song with students, get around the campus. If President Carter fails to understand the core requirements of an internationally-respected research university, and small missteps can prove fatal in this regard, then things can go South very quickly. I am wondering how many leading scholars at Ohio State feel to learn that Trustees in the Talent, Compensation and Governance committee approved an amendment to the university's bylaws, making the provost "'the chief academic officer of the university' rather than chief operating officer". That seems like a plus to me, but does it have implications for funding, freedom to control one's research funding, changes to the academic structure, the attractiveness of the University to faculty and prospective leading PhD students, whatever, that might create recruiting challenges? I don't know. It's all in the details and that is why someone has to have an understanding of the requirements of a complex adaptive system, such as a public research university.
Time may tell that this is a home run hire. The point is that running a university is like herding cats, except some of those cats are sharks that simply can stand up and take a huge chunk of your reputational and research resources and staff with them. That's a dynamic one simply doesn't learn running an aircraft carrier.
Letterhead is not badWhat the "here" you're referencing? (Just curious as its not clear to me)
Anyway I'm not getting into it too deeply other than to say I was a little surprised he was the choice. That said I hope he does a good job.
If it helps, I can tell you he sends a pretty solid form letter for recruiting. (If a little lengthy)