I wish I had more time to address this but I don't.
I will try to look into it late tonight when I get home, but for now:
1. They don't need to show damages to get injunctive relief.
2. They are asserting some ridiculous claims in throwing everything they can at you, likely hoping you guys are unware of the law. For instance, accusing you of being a cybersquatter typically claims one of the following:
- You registered the domain name in order to prevent the owner of the trademark or service mark from reflecting the mark in a corresponding domain name
- You have registered the domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of a competitor
- By using the domain name, you have intentionally attempted to attract, for commercial gain, internet users to your web site or other online location, by creating a likelihood of confusion with the complainant’s mark as to the source, sponsorship, affiliation, or endorsement of your web site or location or of a product or service on your web site or location.
I don't believe this is the case. The dillution argument is rather poor also, and would fail. They are just naming everything without good reason or research. . .