• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Texas Tech Red Raiders (sponsored by BET365)


The league filed a federal lawsuit Monday in the Northern District of Texas seeking both a declaratory judgment and injunctive relief to allow the league the authority to use its bylaws to potentially punish Sorsby. The filing seeks: "A declaratory judgment that the First Amendment protects the Conference's right to invoke its authority under its Bylaws to sanction [Texas Tech] related to its handling of the sports betting activity discussed in this Complaint, including if TTU fields a student-athlete in Big 12 competitions who has engaged in collegiate sports betting activity."

The Big 12's federal suit includes a request for an injunction to allow the league to enforce its own rules. At the heart of this is Big 12 Bylaw 3.6, which allows the league via a supermajority vote to decide whether Texas Tech's conduct warrants sanctions.

The suit seeks to bar Texas Tech from "seeking to deter, coerce, prevent, or punish the Big 12 for exercising its rights under its Bylaws to sanction TTU related to its handling of the sports betting activity discussed in this Complaint, including if TTU fields a student-athlete in Big 12 competitions who has engaged in collegiate sports betting activity."

https://www.espn.com/college-footba...es-suit-vs-texas-tech-texas-ag-brendan-sorsby

In short, the Big 12 desires the potential to punish Texas Tech for planning to play Sorsby. Let that soak in. The Big 12 is not punishing Cincinnati for actually playing Sorsby because he gambled while playing at their institution. They want to punish Texas Tech because Sorsby gambled while playing at Cincinnati and Indiana. How can Texas Tech ever have confidence that the Big 12 Conference will act in its best interest, if it punishes TTU for the (in their words) "unethical behavior" that happens at other schools that are in the same conference?

I have been an avid supporter of the Big 12 Conference and its leadership. I do not think Texas Tech is too good for the Big 12 Conference. However, I now feel the Big 12 Conference is not good enough for Texas Tech or the other schools. The Big 12 Conference is supposed to support its institutions, and help them and their athletes succeed and compete in college athletics. However, it has now shown a bias towards schools in its own conference by not punishing Cincinnati for its actual conduct, and instead pursuing intent to punish another school (Texas Tech) for the same potential conduct.

Sorsby never gambled while playing in a game at Texas Tech. Texas Tech suspended Sorsby immediately after being alerted to the NCAA's ongoing investigation into Sorsby's gambling. Texas Tech declared Sorsby ineligible and send him to rehab for a diagnosed gambling addiction. Texas Tech declared Sorsby ineligible. Texas Tech asked the NCAA to reinstate Sorsby's egibility (and later appealed), to which the NCAA declined both. Sorsby then filed suit against the NCAA, to with an independent judge with no ties to Texas Tech granted an injuction that Sorsby would suffer "probable, imminent and irreparable injury" if he was barred from playing. Therefore, the Big 12 Conference is asking for the ability to punish Texas Tech if Sorsby plays football in accordance to this ruling. It does not show "unlawful" conduct for Sorsby to remain an active player before his court hearing in February 2027. In fact the opposite is true. The Big 12 Conference is requesting Texas Tech go against the ruling of a judge and against the law, in a rogue fashion and at the whim of the conference, to appease public opinion.
 
Upvote 0
So a TT fan thinks because he didn’t gamble at TT he should’ve been ok to play. If they can’t freaking see that it’s bad for a player to gamble then I don’t know what to tell them.

Thankfully this guy is going pro. He tried to come back but the push back was so universal and unanimous that he couldn’t chance it. Screw this kid, he didn’t go pro because it was the correct thing to do. He went pro because he couldn’t afford to gamble his future. So it’s ironic that once again he bet on himself.

Good freaking riddance.

As for TT, no one will forget this bull shit. You had the chance to do right but buckled down. Enjoy spending 40+ mil for a 8-4 team.
 
Upvote 0
Oh, look at Texas Tech cowering now and pretending like they were put into a difficult position and had no choice but to act like a bunch of twats due to their predicament. Like it wasn’t entirely of their own doing.

This is what happens when you punch a fake-ass wannabe bully in the mouth. They back down and beg for leniency. Maybe we should try that more often instead of always letting the loud-mouth cocksuckers win?
 
Oh, look at Texas Tech cowering now and pretending like they were put into a difficult position and had no choice but to act like a bunch of twats due to their predicament. Like it wasn’t entirely of their own doing.

This is what happens when you punch a fake-ass wannabe bully in the mouth. They back down and beg for leniency. Maybe we should try that more often instead of always letting the loud-mouth cocksuckers win?

This
 
Upvote 0

Pat Forde: Brendan Sorsby’s College Career Is Over Because of the Big 12’s Mounting Pressure

The conference’s firm stance that the quarterback should not play this season could be a blueprint for future league activism.

The Big 12 Conference did what the Lubbock District Court would not and the NCAA could not. It closed ranks, exerted pressure and helped persuade Texas Tech and Brendan Sorsby that there is no longer a place for the quarterback in college football. This was a master class in taking care of your own neighborhood.

Maybe it’s even a blueprint for other conferences in handling members who try to skirt NCAA rules by running to court.

Monday night, after a week of mounting outrage over Sorsby’s dubiously gained temporary injunction to play for the Red Raiders in 2026, he decided to move on to the NFL supplemental draft. It’s the right move for college athletics, even if it now tosses the hot potato into the hands of Roger Goodell & Co. The NFL is hardly a league full of choir boys, but welcoming in someone who compulsively gambled on his own sport and own team is not to be taken lightly.

Hopefully Sorsby has a full recovery from gambling addiction. Playing for Texas Tech in the fall didn’t need to be part of it, and might actually have run counter to it.

Thus an embarrassing chapter in the sport ends without turning the Big 12 season into a sideshow. Kudos to commissioner Brett Yormark and the campus leadership of 15 schools that refused to go along with the scam. They backed up their outrage with a mix of conviction and pragmatism—not backing down in the face of threatened lawsuits, but also not overreacting with a bad plan for retribution.

A series of league meetings last week made clear that the Big 12 was intent on applying sanctions to Texas Tech if it played Sorsby. That stance never wavered as Texas attorney general Ken Paxton and Sorsby’s lawyer, Jeffrey Kessler, threatened legal action. It never wavered as Tech put out a marathon PR video that tried too hard and still said too little. It never wavered in confronting the billionaire booster who is disrupting college sports, Cody Campbell.

It helped when other attorneys general, from the states of Oklahoma and Kansas, came out in support of the Big 12. But the bigger statement came from the league itself, which filed a fierce and detailed complaint against Texas Tech and Paxton in federal court Monday morning in advance of an executive board meeting. That was a powerful punch that changed the terms of engagement.

“The Big 12 has removed any doubt that they aren’t playing around,” prominent attorney Tom Mars told Sportico on Monday. “Now that Texas Tech realizes this isn’t some junior high school disagreement and that they’re in federal court, it will be interesting to see how much hubris and swag they still have.”

The answer: not much. When enough people stand up to the loudest guy in the bar while he is flexing his muscles, a confrontation can end before anyone gets hurt.

Give the Big 12 membership credit for doing what seems increasingly rare in college sports—looking out for their collective best interests. This is a league that survived the SEC poaching Texas and Oklahoma because everyone else stuck together, realizing that its strength came as a group and not individually. Similar teamwork was in play here, with a unified stance in favor of what was right.

And also give credit to Yormark, who came into the job in 2022 as a brash, outsider businessman and now looks like a strong, smart leader who understands his constituency. He’s had a few gimmicky ideas, some of which were better than others, but his handling of this hot-button issue shows his substance.

It isn’t easy to load up resistance against the defending league champion and overwhelming league favorite if Sorsby had stayed at Tech. The Red Raiders were becoming what the Big 12 had hungered for: a flagship power that could compete nationally, rising above the league’s sprawling middle class. But the case against Sorsby was so clear that even after a crackpot ruling let him out of NCAA jail, the Big 12 wasn’t going to roll over for its top football program.

Does this set a new precedent for conference activism? That’s to be determined, but it’s a bold step. As one program after another has gone to court in hopes of finding a compliant judge who will make a convenient eligibility ruling that handcuffs the NCAA, that program’s conference peers have passively fumed. Some complaints might have been heard, but often anonymously and rarely leading to significant conference action.
.
.
.
continued
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pat Forde: Brendan Sorsby’s College Career Is Over Because of the Big 12’s Mounting Pressure

The conference’s firm stance that the quarterback should not play this season could be a blueprint for future league activism.

The Big 12 Conference did what the Lubbock District Court would not and the NCAA could not. It closed ranks, exerted pressure and helped persuade Texas Tech and Brendan Sorsby that there is no longer a place for the quarterback in college football. This was a master class in taking care of your own neighborhood.

Maybe it’s even a blueprint for other conferences in handling members who try to skirt NCAA rules by running to court.

Monday night, after a week of mounting outrage over Sorsby’s dubiously gained temporary injunction to play for the Red Raiders in 2026, he decided to move on to the NFL supplemental draft. It’s the right move for college athletics, even if it now tosses the hot potato into the hands of Roger Goodell & Co. The NFL is hardly a league full of choir boys, but welcoming in someone who compulsively gambled on his own sport and own team is not to be taken lightly.

Hopefully Sorsby has a full recovery from gambling addiction. Playing for Texas Tech in the fall didn’t need to be part of it, and might actually have run counter to it.

Thus an embarrassing chapter in the sport ends without turning the Big 12 season into a sideshow. Kudos to commissioner Brett Yormark and the campus leadership of 15 schools that refused to go along with the scam. They backed up their outrage with a mix of conviction and pragmatism—not backing down in the face of threatened lawsuits, but also not overreacting with a bad plan for retribution.

A series of league meetings last week made clear that the Big 12 was intent on applying sanctions to Texas Tech if it played Sorsby. That stance never wavered as Texas attorney general Ken Paxton and Sorsby’s lawyer, Jeffrey Kessler, threatened legal action. It never wavered as Tech put out a marathon PR video that tried too hard and still said too little. It never wavered in confronting the billionaire booster who is disrupting college sports, Cody Campbell.

It helped when other attorneys general, from the states of Oklahoma and Kansas, came out in support of the Big 12. But the bigger statement came from the league itself, which filed a fierce and detailed complaint against Texas Tech and Paxton in federal court Monday morning in advance of an executive board meeting. That was a powerful punch that changed the terms of engagement.

“The Big 12 has removed any doubt that they aren’t playing around,” prominent attorney Tom Mars told Sportico on Monday. “Now that Texas Tech realizes this isn’t some junior high school disagreement and that they’re in federal court, it will be interesting to see how much hubris and swag they still have.”

The answer: not much. When enough people stand up to the loudest guy in the bar while he is flexing his muscles, a confrontation can end before anyone gets hurt.

Give the Big 12 membership credit for doing what seems increasingly rare in college sports—looking out for their collective best interests. This is a league that survived the SEC poaching Texas and Oklahoma because everyone else stuck together, realizing that its strength came as a group and not individually. Similar teamwork was in play here, with a unified stance in favor of what was right.

And also give credit to Yormark, who came into the job in 2022 as a brash, outsider businessman and now looks like a strong, smart leader who understands his constituency. He’s had a few gimmicky ideas, some of which were better than others, but his handling of this hot-button issue shows his substance.

It isn’t easy to load up resistance against the defending league champion and overwhelming league favorite if Sorsby had stayed at Tech. The Red Raiders were becoming what the Big 12 had hungered for: a flagship power that could compete nationally, rising above the league’s sprawling middle class. But the case against Sorsby was so clear that even after a crackpot ruling let him out of NCAA jail, the Big 12 wasn’t going to roll over for its top football program.

Does this set a new precedent for conference activism? That’s to be determined, but it’s a bold step. As one program after another has gone to court in hopes of finding a compliant judge who will make a convenient eligibility ruling that handcuffs the NCAA, that program’s conference peers have passively fumed. Some complaints might have been heard, but often anonymously and rarely leading to significant conference action.
.
.
.
continued
1781582027142.gif
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top