Yeah, that game really had a negative effect on Max Wray's decision, too...oh wait.
-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter MililaniBuckeye
- Start date
You clearly insinuate that the OU debacle had an effect on current recruiting (in this case, Parsons) when in reality it didn't. Maybe you should read @LordJeffBuck's earlier comments on how the outcome of one game does not have significant impact on recruiting.
Upvote
0
Well, as surprising as this is, you're wrong yet again. I didn't insinuate that....you inferred it.
The insinuation is that something stemming from the OU game triggered this....which was already insinuated earlier in this thread. He tweeted about needing a QB change during the OU game, it angered the wrong people, now MD is saying he's out. The OU game being the gift that keeps on giving......just like betting on you being wrong about something is a bet that will keep on paying out.
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote
0
When you post "The Oklahoma game....the gift that keeps on giving" immediately after a recruit becomes one who is no longer targeted by this program, that's a full-on insinuation that the game itself affected his recruitment, whether you intended to insinuate or not. Now, if you said something like, "Ill-advised Tweets...the gift that keeps on giving", then yeah, there's no insinuation that the game outcome was a factor.
Upvote
0
27's post was the eleventh one about the ill-advised tweet. It was pretty obvious what was being discussed.
Despite the anguish for us fans, the recruiting results were largely positive. The exception to the rule (regarding losses hurting recruiting) is when things get ugly in the locker room or lead to bad hosts. In this case, Parsons did it all by himself and may have ended his recruitment.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Did a certain long time poster have reading comprehension issues again? Color me shocked.
I doubt very seriously you understood what you were saying in a post you, yourself, authored, BN27.
Upvote
0
BN27's post was the ninth post on that page. Of the seven previous posts, not one mentioned the tweet at all, and first post one the page quoted a post that mentioned the tweet but didn't directly address it. But, hey, excuse me for not readin every single post in the thread prior to replying to BN27's post.
See above.
Upvote
0
There's some folks on the internet that reserve comment until they have taken in the conversation to achieve a full understanding of what's going on, and then there there are those who just jump into a conversation as if they know what's going on, but don't, and then use that admitted ignorance as an excuse. Who has time for all that fancy readin anyway?
Reminds me of the days when some newb would show up here, read the board for a few hours, and then feel they were fit to diagnose all BPs problems. Then, while spouting off they'd get their panties in a bunch when the well respected members of the community would point out the newb's lack of credibility on the matters at issue.
Reminds me of the days when some newb would show up here, read the board for a few hours, and then feel they were fit to diagnose all BPs problems. Then, while spouting off they'd get their panties in a bunch when the well respected members of the community would point out the newb's lack of credibility on the matters at issue.
Upvote
0