I'd take the time to graph out on the screenshot that I took where using Zeke's path to movement as the B side of a right triangle and #22's path as the C side and show that it was indeed longer, but you clearly wouldn't grasp it, so there's no point. And seeing as #22 is behind Zeke, even at a slight angle, then Zeke was by definition "caught from behind". Being caught from behind doesn't mean one has to caught from perfectly directly behind.You're confusing "getting tackled" with "getting caught from behind." It's too bad Zeke got clipped just a bit, because then you wouldn't be so confused (to say nothing of your clear lack of understanding of trig; protip: if you know very, very little about a subject, next time don't try to appeal to that subject in an attempt to support an argument you're making ).
Upvote
0