Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I'm guessing that missing half a season (due to the strike) factored into that a little bit. Dunno.I remember the past 2 season finales were amazing. The kind where you question whether you can live till the premiere. This one just left me wondering if they were going to end this show so I could get my hour back on Monday night.
fourteenandoh;1097350; said:i have to agree with CCI here. they really need to get back into the story line involving the company. that is where the true drama is.
Bucks21;1097727; said:Straight up, the company has the most potential for intriguing story lines. I want to know whats going on with Whistler. What is his involvement with the company and what is the company.
JohnnyCockfight;1097788; said:My impression is that "the company" is the illuminati, and that Whistler is someone very important in that organization. Did anyone else get this impression - either from watching Season 2 or from commercials where they hinted at this?
Looking back on the series, Season 1 was about breaking out of the prison where Linc was unjustly placed on death row. It seems that this show was intended to be a mini-series that was supposed to end once they broke out. However, money talks, and when it became apparent how popular the show was, the TV execs continued the series on.
Hence, Season 2 ended up revolving around the subsequent life on the run for the escapees, and also the fleshing out of "the company" and their ability to manipulate U.S. politics at the highest level. Season 2, then, had very little to do with the original conception of the show, which was to break out of a prison.
Then came Season 3, which we all know was cut short due to the writer's strike. In any event, Season 3 pitted many of the usual suspects from Season 1 back in prison, only in a third world country, where it turns out many, if not all, of them were planted by "the company" to break Whistler out. So, in my opinion, Season 3 attempted to get back to its roots with the idea of breaking out of prison, but also sought to incorporate the elements of "the company." The focus was certainly on the actual prison break, but who is to say that a full season wouldn't have given equal treatment to both of the parallel storylines? Or, if the trend of Seasons 1 & 2 were to be repeated, then maybe Season 3 was meant to focus on the prison break, and Season 4 on "the company" once again.
But I remain steadfast in the opinion that Prison Break has mastered the art of the cliffhanger (learned from 24), no matter how much you are required to stretch your imagine.
That might be difficult.
methomps;1097915; said:That might be difficult.
OHSportsFan9;1097921; said:they could say "the company" knocked her up