-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter mercer_buckeye
- Start date
They only ever bitch about calls that go against them, too. They have such a lack of anything outside their little bubble. Maybe stop and think that you watch only PSU games, so that's all you'll ever see. Or when you watch a PSU football game and PSU has the ball, you're watching the QB or RB or WR....not your OLine getting away with just as many holds. When you watch PSU on defense you're watching your DLine try to get to the QB and see every "hold".
Fuck....just once I'd like to see somebody force them to see reality. One fucking time. I have half a mind to watch every snap of our game and show them that they got away with a dozen holds against Bosa alone. B1G refs try not to call holding unless it's horribly blatant. This isn't news and it's not a fucking conspiracy.
Upvote
0
Upvote
0
Buckeye86
I do not choose to discuss it
I have a theory about Penn State's relationship with athletic rules enforcement...
Growing up, does everyone remember that whiny little bitch who thought he was better than you and tattled on everyone for everything?
Did that kid get picked on more or less by the other neighborhood kids for constantly being a douchebag about everything?
Growing up, does everyone remember that whiny little bitch who thought he was better than you and tattled on everyone for everything?
Did that kid get picked on more or less by the other neighborhood kids for constantly being a douchebag about everything?
Upvote
0
Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
Ha! Who the bork wrote that article? This line has me confused:
I was unaware that you aren't supposed to be called for fouls on Senior Night. Maybe this Newbill is a senior? The article doesn't seem to say. If he's a senior, he isn't supposed to be called for fouls on Senior Night? Maybe the rest of that paragraph will explain:
Yes - same paragraph. To me, that means that the fact that the call was against this guy on senior night was cruel should have something similar with the rest of the paragraph. But it doesn't. It just talks about how the guy is unappreciated because of these stats and his team loses a lot, and has no one else to score. What does all of that gibberish have to do with the next pile of gibberish? Also, you're underappreciated because you score points, but no one else does and your team loses? I could see if they made an argument for all Big Ten, or some awards where they feel he's been snubbed. But your team losing doesn't make you underappreciated.
Upvote
0
Zurp
I have misplaced my pants.
https://bwi.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=36&tid=179348314&mid=179348314&sid=890&style=2
dtwice goes into more statistical analysis on the penalties called in Big Ten play in 2014. He admits to TRYING to find certain conclusions (that Ohio State gets special treatment and Penn State gets hosed). (Really scientific research there - who goes into these things TRYING to find the pre-conceived conclusions?) Anyway, he admits that he cannot find the conclusions he's looking for, and the rest of the fan base calls his research "worthless" for that reason.
dtwice goes into more statistical analysis on the penalties called in Big Ten play in 2014. He admits to TRYING to find certain conclusions (that Ohio State gets special treatment and Penn State gets hosed). (Really scientific research there - who goes into these things TRYING to find the pre-conceived conclusions?) Anyway, he admits that he cannot find the conclusions he's looking for, and the rest of the fan base calls his research "worthless" for that reason.
Upvote
0