OSUBasketballJunkie
Never Forget 31-0
link
12/20/05
12/20/05
OSU shows improvement under NCAA graduation formula
School still lags behind conference, national scores
Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Tim May
THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH
<!--PHOTOS--><TABLE class=phototableright align=right border=0><!-- begin large ad code --><TBODY><TR><TD><TABLE align=center><TBODY></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
The NCAA yesterday unveiled what it believes is a more accurate method than the federal government’s for computing how well schools do in graduating student-athletes.
For Ohio State, it showed an improvement in the graduation rates for football and men’s basketball, but OSU still rated in the bottom half of the Big Ten. For major colleges as a whole, however, "these early finds are really spectacular," NCAA president Myles Brand said.
The NCAA’s Graduation Success Rate shows that 76 percent of student-athletes who enrolled at a Division I school between 1995 and 1998 had graduated after six years. The Department of Education had calculated it at 62 percent.
"That is a dramatic difference and it is due to a much more accurate counting (by the NCAA)," Brand said.
The Department of Education looked only at who had enrolled at a school as a student-athlete and then had graduated from it after six years. The NCAA tracked not only those students, but ones who transferred and then graduated from another school, and junior-college players who transferred in and graduated.
"We must respect that migration of students in order to get accurate data," Brand said.
Even though such accounting helped Ohio State improve to 52 percent from 49 percent in football and to 45 percent from 25 percent in men’s basketball, the Buckeyes still were ninth out of 11 schools in the Big Ten.
They also are well off the beam compared with the national Graduation Success Rates — 64 percent in football and 58 percent in men’s basketball.
But the Graduation Success Rate is what the NCAA refers to as historical data. What will concern schools more is the second edition of the Academic Progress Rate, which tracks current players’ academic progress and eligibility.
That edition is due out in February. The teams that fall well below an APR score of .925 could face sanctions, from loss of scholarships to postseason bans.
Though Ohio State scored a .892 in football and .910 in basketball in the first edition, a spokesman for the athletics department yesterday said OSU anticipates every one of its teams to meet at least the .925 minimum in February.
Football, for example, had 55 players post a 3.00 grade-point average or better in fall quarter, the spokesman said, and the team’s overall GPA has risen to 2.81.
The reason the NCAA devised such categories as APR and GSR was "to provide greater transparency and accountability" of the main mission of member schools, said University of Hartford president Dr. Walter Harrison, chairman of the NCAA committee on academic reform. That mission is to see that studentathletes are provided a meaningful education in exchange for their athletic effort.
The idea is to expose the "worst of the worst" of those derelict in that mission over time and penalize them, Harrison said.
[email protected]