Open Mouth, Insert Foot

[Poe McKnoe]

This is where we get into issues around here...

Not a bad post...not sure why it was posted or why it was dug up...but initially, not bad.

Then it slowly derails until someone feels the need to slam a kid.

I don't get it.

Why even post it?

Anyway, back to Mo...with some sense please..

I was probably the initiator of the discussion, but that's what it is. Discussion.

I didn't say I think Mo Wells sucks. I supported my argument with statistics. And quite frankly, the statistics aren't what I would expect from the backup RB.

I gave credit to Mo Wells for being a team player and said the play calling has sucked in regards to Mo Wells. But the truth is, if, and that's a big IF, there is someone better behind you on the chart, it's unfair to the other player.

It's a forum where you can discuss what you like about players and what you don't like. I like that Mo Wells is shifty and quick, but I don't like that he falls down when someone gets a hand on him.

I think it's ok to censor comments that are demeaning, but it's hard to censor facts.

 

[Bleed S & G]

I think it's ok to censor comments that are demeaning, but it's hard to censor facts.

 

[jwinslow]

But the truth is, if, and that's a big IF, there is someone better behind you on the chart, it's unfair to the other player.

As the season progressed, I'd say Mo was more consistent than Saine, unless you're pimping Boom's practice showings with this comment.

Minn 14 52 yds 3.7 ypc
Purd 15 74 yds 4.9 ypc
PSU 13 55 yds 4.2 ypc
ILL 6 30 yds 5.0 ypc 1 td

Other than KSU, Brandon was ineffective as the season progressed. Hopefully he regains his old form and pushes the stable of backs.

 

[Poe McKnoe]

As the season progressed, I'd say Mo was more consistent than Saine, unless you're pimping Boom's practice showings with this comment.

Minn 14 52 yds 3.7 ypc
Purd 15 74 yds 4.9 ypc
PSU 13 55 yds 4.2 ypc
ILL 6 30 yds 5.0 ypc 1 td

Other than KSU, Brandon was ineffective as the season progressed. Hopefully he regains his old form and pushes the stable of backs.

I said IF, not THERE IS.

 

[osugrad21]

I was probably the initiator of the discussion, but that's what it is. Discussion.

I didn't say I think Mo Wells sucks. I supported my argument with statistics. And quite frankly, the statistics aren't what I would expect from the backup RB.

I gave credit to Mo Wells for being a team player and said the play calling has sucked in regards to Mo Wells. But the truth is, if, and that's a big IF, there is someone better behind you on the chart, it's unfair to the other player.

It's a forum where you can discuss what you like about players and what you don't like. I like that Mo Wells is shifty and quick, but I don't like that he falls down when someone gets a hand on him.

I think it's ok to censor comments that are demeaning, but it's hard to censor facts.

First off, I don't need a reminder that this is a forum for discussion...I believe you will find out we know pretty damn well how to run a forum. Its not for everyone but we do pretty well for the group we do hit.

Next, my comments were for the deleted/warned post...not yours which I referred to as "Not a bad post...not sure why it was posted or why it was dug up...but initially, not bad."

I'd suggest realizing what's up before you shoot off next time slick. We know how to run this place and have been doing so a whole lot longer than your 2.5 months amongst us.

That is a fact that doesn't need censored.

 

[TRON]

I was probably the initiator of the discussion, but that's what it is. Discussion.

I didn't say I think Mo Wells sucks. I supported my argument with statistics. And quite frankly, the statistics aren't what I would expect from the backup RB.

I gave credit to Mo Wells for being a team player and said the play calling has sucked in regards to Mo Wells. But the truth is, if, and that's a big IF, there is someone better behind you on the chart, it's unfair to the other player.

It's a forum where you can discuss what you like about players and what you don't like. I like that Mo Wells is shifty and quick, but I don't like that he falls down when someone gets a hand on him.

I think it's ok to censor comments that are demeaning, but it's hard to censor facts.

 

[buckeyefool]

Just a quick reminder grad21...this is a discussion board

First off, I don't need a reminder that this is a forum for discussion...I believe you will find out we know pretty damn well how to run a forum. Its not for everyone but we do pretty well for the group we do hit.

Next, my comments were for the deleted/warned post...not yours which I referred to as "Not a bad post...not sure why it was posted or why it was dug up...but initially, not bad."

I'd suggest realizing what's up before you shoot off next time slick. We know how to run this place and have been doing so a whole lot longer than your 2.5 months amongst us.

That is a fact that doesn't need censored.

 

[SparkyOSU]

Discuss.

 

[scooter1369]

Yo. Can I ax you sumfin Pacific?

 

[Padraig]

I don't need a reminder that this is a forum for discussion...you will find out we know pretty damn well how to run a forum.

Damn message board Mafia.

Always censorin me an shit...


:box:


...I mean, they're only here to keep me from hurting myself. (where do I pay my monthly "protection fee" again?)

 

[OCBucksFan]

The internet is serious business.

 

[Mike80]

The internet is serious business.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtOoQFa5ug8]YouTube - DJ Ted Stevens Techno Remix: "A Series of Tubes"[/ame]