Explanation by head ref on the INT overturn decision. Still calling bull[Mark May].
What actually happened does not matter.
What matters is this: Was the "absolute standard of indisputable video evidence" met on that particular play. That is the Big Ten's standard for overturning a call made on the field, and the emphasis is their own, not mine.
Was the call on the field incorrect? Perhaps. However, there was no indisputable video evidence that justified overturning that call. None. Zero. Zip. Nada. The call should have stood as an interception.
Upvote
0