generaladm
Legend
LordJeffBuck;1298206; said:I hate to disappoint you, but Lane is a fifth-year senior. His chances to start are over.
Don't lie, JLB, you love to disappoint me. Oh well, hopefully Lane can make enough of an impression in limited duty to get an invite to an NFL training camp. The guys really playing, but that backfield is nearly impossible to crack.
Coaching does matter, just not as much as talent matters. I'd say that talent on the field is probably 90% of the equation ... and because talent can be "coached up" during practice, then maybe the actual break-down is 70% talent, 30% coaching. Bottom line: In college football, the most important job for the coaches is to recruit the talent.
I mostly agree with you, but I'll say this: Good to great coaching can make a marginal improvement on talent, bad coaching can make talent irrelevant. Look at the legacy of John L. Smith. He didn't have talent on par with the elite BCS teams, but the team's schizophrenic meltdowns were an indication of a lack of preparation and direction. Same with ND last year, the talent was better than 3-9, but the coaching kept getting in the way. Auburn and Clemson are programs that are supposed to have the talent level to compete with elite teams, but their results are consistently below expectations. It could be argued that John Cooper prevented some of his teams from reaching their true potential. I think most teams reflect the personality of the coaching staff. There's certainly no substitution for talent, but talent needs direction.
Upvote
0