• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Official 2006 NCAA Tournament Discussion Thread

If the committee is going to take shit for anything, it ought to be for seeding conference tournament champions (Syracuse, Iowa) WAY too high if they were medicore the rest of the year.
 
Upvote 0
If the committee is going to take shit for anything, it ought to be for seeding conference tournament champions (Syracuse, Iowa) WAY too high if they were medicore the rest of the year.
FYI, Iowa finished all alone in 2nd place in the Big Ten, and they had a harder conference schedule than the Buckeyes.

damn. that's the first game that really fucked me. i was 12-4 yesterday, but lost none of my sweet 16.

i had Xavier over Gonzaga, and would have won if it wasn't for the refs calling ALL KINDS of bullshit fouls down the stretch.
 
Upvote 0
Everyone seems to think we're a better hit with Northern Iowa, so I'm rooting for them (the fact I picked them of course has nothing to do with that :biggrin: )

And as for that lv, yes, I know, but they actually tied for 2nd with Illinois unless I'm mistaken, and they lost to Iowa State, Northern Iowa, NW, and Minnesota, and barely eeked out a win over Drake. Does that mean they suck? No...but does it mean they are a top 12 team? Not in my opinion.
 
Upvote 0
Everyone seems to think we're a better hit with Northern Iowa, so I'm rooting for them (the fact I picked them of course has nothing to do with that :biggrin: )

And as for that lv, yes, I know, but they actually tied for 2nd with Illinois unless I'm mistaken, and they lost to Iowa State, Northern Iowa, NW, and Minnesota, and barely eeked out a win over Drake. Does that mean they suck? No...but does it mean they are a top 12 team? Not in my opinion.
damn... i should keep my mouth shut during basketball discussions...
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top