In the "Robert Kraft case", I am trying to understand if the police were "co-conspirators" in human trafficking.
Per this link, per allegation, there is evidently some kind of video of a combination BJ/HJ , along with transfer of money:
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/...rostitution-the-day-of-afc-championship-game/
How does that video happen?
Did the police secretly slip a video camera into the affected area? I guess that would be fine, except for possible privacy violations. Although when they let trafficking happen for an extended amount of time, it raises ethical questions (in my mind).
Or did the victim (traffickee) know about it? Did the police kind of pull a Robert Mueller and say "wear a wire of you will go to jail"? If so that we be troubling, because then you have a victim of alleged human trafficking seemingly being trafficked by the local PD.
I may have heard that the police let the video roll for months? I would think that at some point, it is morally necessary to stop the trafficking instead of knowing about it and letting it happen? Is it ethical to let it happen in order to create a big john's list (although it may be the most effective way to stop trafficking)?
Or maybe all this talk of trafficking is really a true side show, since Kraft was not charged with anything like that?