Tressel played Tressel-ball with a few 3*s, a lot of 4*s, and his share of 5*s. That's not what is going on with Sparty, so the offense is limited BY INTENT, and then it is limited by recruiting, talent, and how effective the coaching staff develops players.
That style of play wins a ton of games. At the same time, if your running game gets limited, your defense gets leaky and exploited, you turn the ball over, or you have special teams breakdowns - and you find yourself down 2/+ scores - you are not built to come back by going to plan B.
Can Sparty be an Ohio State program (that starts with higher end talent and then tries to get them to play like it) or are they more of a Wisky (that starts with lower level talent, uses redshirts, develops players, and uses an identity to keep it rolling)? I think Sparty is way closer to Wisky than they are to Ohio State. There are historical, geographical, and practical reasons for that, but I sense that Dantonio succeeded in winning some big games and making the playoffs by maximizing the 3*/development route, but then tried to take the next step in elevating talent, but can't quite get there.
Main point is that Wisconsin knows what it is and isn't trying to be anything else. I'm not sure I know what Sparty is or is trying to be.
As to your question, Greyshirt, there is no good way to cope with it. All you can do is embrace the suck by predicting, expecting, and accepting that Dave Left on 3rd and 2 will result in a 2 yard loss because the other team and every fan in the stands with a modicum of knowledge knows it is coming, and take a degree of pride that you are in the group that knew what was going to happen.