Dwayne Haskins second string confirmed.
#shhh
Problem is Joe, some SEC booster would find a way to turn free hamburgers into a way to get Ricky Lee Fivestar's momma on board for him to go to Ol' Tex...if you know what I mean
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dwayne Haskins second string confirmed.
#shhh
Dwayne Haskins second string confirmed.
#shhh
How is there exploitation? These kids are getting world class training and education for free!! Along with many other benefits.The tweet is obviously talking about banning the purchase of hamburgers for student athletes due to the appearance or potential for receiving said patty based on their status as a student athlete (meanwhile their likeness is used for profit constantly in a non-profit business).
The exploitation is substantial. The system is a farce, but it's largely a beneficial one.
It's pretty obvious how it's exploitation. You simply like the exploitation so you think it's okay.How is there exploitation? These kids are getting world class training and education for free!! Along with many other benefits.
No, it's not. In any other industry, there would be lawyers suing the pants off of the NCAA for exploitation of their likeness, or overzealous non-compete enforcement.You will say well the NCAA is making so much money. That's how the world works.
Yeah, because outside of athletics, the most talented students/graduates working at top employers always surrender all of their earning power (because they have no other choice).These kids are getting better benefits for playing football then most employees at major companies.
No, it's not exploitation.NCAA also has to balance many other non revenue sports. And if you really want to get into and paid these kids should we have paid Ezekiel Elliott the same as Joe Burrow? Would that have been fair to you? Is that also exploitation?
The tweet is obviously talking about banning the purchase of hamburgers for student athletes due to the appearance or potential for receiving said patty based on their status as a student athlete (meanwhile their likeness is used for profit constantly in a non-profit business).
The exploitation is substantial. The system is a farce, but it's largely a beneficial one.
Exploitation is in the eye of the beholder. As a college player you think your exploitation is horrific, Mc Donald's employees think they are exploited and on and on.
It's pretty obvious how it's exploitation. You simply like the exploitation so you think it's okay.
OSU sells thousands ofJT BarrettI'mHonoringTheCalendarYear jerseys without paying him a dime. The school/league/NCAA sell billions in advertising with his and his teammates' likenesses. They made millions and millions with digital replications of their likenesses. They hold a basketball tournament that generates a billion all by itself. It's blatant exploitation and the pithy return on their investment is a very outdated revenue model that has not adjusted with the explosion in revenue.
The problem is that few programs are like Ohio State, and so if you address the exploitation and pay athletes (even a sliver of what they are worth), you jeopardize the entire system, particularly the more legitimate student athletes in non revenue sports. It's a farce but a beneficial one.
No, it's not. In any other industry, there would be lawyers suing the pants off of the NCAA for exploitation of their likeness, or overzealous non-compete enforcement.
Yeah, because the most talented students/graduates working at top employers usually surrender all of their earning power (because they have no other choice), most of them doing so with the knowledge that 99% of them will lose almost every ounce of their value the minute they step off campus.No, it's not exploitation.
If they put Barrett's name on the jersey, they'd lose tens of millions in court.OSU didn't pay JT Barrett a dime? Gee then how did he pay for that degree? How did he pay for Mickey Marrotti's training and Urban's coaching that allowed him to be a good player in the first place? How did he pay for his apartment? How did he pay for all the food and nutritionist he got? How did he pay for his tutoring to pass his classes?
That's not payment to you? That stuff isn't free for OSU. How is that a pithy return? JT got 200k by avoiding out of state tuiton on his degree. Gee how much do you think Marrotti's training is worth? Urban's coaching? I'll put the value at like 100k for JT which is generous. All that clothing, housing, and food? Let's be very generous and say 50k.
So JT probably received over 350k in benefits in 4 years at OSU. Not good enough for you?
I make it up to him in other ways!!111!!!11!!OSU didn't pay JT Barrett a dime? Gee then how did he pay for that degree? How did he pay for Mickey Marrotti's training and Urban's coaching that allowed him to be a good player in the first place? How did he pay for his apartment? How did he pay for all the food and nutritionist he got? How did he pay for his tutoring to pass his classes?
That's not payment to you? That stuff isn't free for OSU. How is that a pithy return? JT got 200k by avoiding out of state tuiton on his degree. Gee how much do you think Marrotti's training is worth? Urban's coaching? I'll put the value at like 100k for JT which is generous. All that clothing, housing, and food? Let's be very generous and say 50k.
So JT probably received over 350k in benefits in 4 years at OSU. Not good enough for you?
The only reason he could make money on his jersey number is once again because of the resources Ohio State provided him for free in the very first place.If they put Barrett's name on the jersey, they'd lose tens of millions in court.
if they laughably pretend it's a 2016 jersey, they keep making millions on merchandise revenue from many sources in "not the player but lol come on we all know it's his" jerseys
But please, keep throwing out numbers to pretend that blatant exploitation doesn't exist. I'm sure Ezekiel Elliott would be thrilled if the Cowboys started splitting his jersey sales up with the entire football team. As long as he gets to play in a world class facility with the same level of coaching, nutrition and media coverage, who cares if the long snapper gets as much benefit as he does, and Jerry Jones gets the lions' share of the profit?
This argument is the same as a McDonalds fry cook saying he should receive a royalty on the fries that were sold. But McDonald's supplied him with the potatoes, the training, the oven etc...If they put Barrett's name on the jersey, they'd lose tens of millions in court.
if they laughably pretend it's a 2016 jersey, they keep making millions on merchandise revenue from many sources in "not the player but lol come on we all know it's his" jerseys
But please, keep throwing out numbers to pretend that blatant exploitation doesn't exist. I'm sure Ezekiel Elliott would be thrilled if the Cowboys started splitting his jersey sales up with the entire football team. As long as he gets to play in a world class facility with the same level of coaching, nutrition and media coverage, who cares if the long snapper gets as much benefit as he does, and Jerry Jones gets the lions' share of the profit?