• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

NCAA 13 (PS3) 5th Annual Online Dynasty Thread

Available teams (4* Prestige NOT in the top 25 or any 3* and below team)

ACC
Boston College
Duke
Georgia Tech
Maryland
NC State
North Carolina
Virginia

Big Ten
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Minnesota
Northwestern
Purdue

Big 12
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Texas Tech

Big East
Cincinnati
Connecticut
Louisville
Pittsburgh
Rutgers
Syracuse
Temple
USF

Pac-12
Arizona
Arizona State
Cal
Colorado
Oregon State
UCLA
Utah
Washington
Washington State

SEC
Kentucky
Mississippi State
Missouri
Ole Miss
Tennessee
Texas A&M
Vanderbilt

All Mid-Majors not named Boise State and Independents not named Notre Dame.
 
Upvote 0
Smooth Olaf;2176244; said:
I can wait until next Monday.

Are rosters out yet?

I won't be getting the game til the weekend and haven't checked the boards yet regarding rosters, bugs and if there will be an early patch.

And will Monday be the draft? Or you want to be able to send out invites by Monday?
 
Upvote 0
The read option is much more effective. I played with tOSU vs UM online last night and Braxtons first step was quick, I averaged 8 yds per carry running the read option.

My concern is it might be overly effective but I'll reserve judgement until I play a better opponent. The guy I played didn't adjust at all. On the flip side Denard is ridiculous in this game, he was shedding tackles and running away from everyone the whole game. At least he was very inaccurate passing.
 
Upvote 0
OneBuckeye;2176419; said:
Anyone run the option in 2013 yet? Is it effective? Has anyone run an option the dynasty in the past? My PSN is Obreski
Read? triple? under center? shotgun?

I've run the flexbone since 2010 with mostly poor results due to my own problems with passing from the flexbone, and the lack of constraint plays in the flexbone formations. I finally abandoned it in time to go on a little run at the end of NCAA '12. I've messed around with the wingbone and flexbone this year, and will probably run that offense in the other dynasty. The major problem that I'm having with the double and triple options is that they changed the pitch and fake pitch buttons. Pitch is now L1 (used to be fake pitch), and fake pitch is now down on the right analog stick (used to be high step).
 
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;2176433; said:
Read? triple? under center? shotgun?

I've run the flexbone since 2010 with mostly poor results due to my own problems with passing from the flexbone, and the lack of constraint plays in the flexbone formations. I finally abandoned it in time to go on a little run at the end of NCAA '12. I've messed around with the wingbone and flexbone this year, and will probably run that offense in the other dynasty. The major problem that I'm having with the double and triple options is that they changed the pitch and fake pitch buttons. Pitch is now L1 (used to be fake pitch), and fake pitch is now down on the right analog stick (used to be high step).

In 2012 i ran the flexbone, mostly ran speed options, power running plays and sweeps with 3 effective passing plays. I had to mix in some ace and I formations for better passing potential, but still ran pretty effectively out of those formations as well.

I have never got the triple option (QB keep or Pitch) to work effectively in any NCAA game FB dive would work if it was open.

I found I needed a QB with 87 + speed to be explosive out of the flex bone as most of my long 50+ TD runs were on the QB keep.
 
Upvote 0
Smooth Olaf;2176316; said:
Available teams (4* Prestige NOT in the top 25 or any 3* and below team)


All Mid-Majors not named Boise State and Independents not named Notre Dame.

So.... if we would take a mid-major school *cough*ohio*cough* would we be able to move them to a BCS/Major conference?

Along those lines... I would assume we would try to limit 2 human teams per conference as long as the number of players allows us?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top