• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Mizzou -3.5 at Kansas (ov/un 57.5)

BB73

Loves Buckeye History
Staff member
Bookie
'16 & '17 Upset Contest Winner
Two years ago, Mizzou gave Kansas their first loss while heading to #1 after the win.

A lot can change in two years.
 
Wow...interesting unis in this one. Can't say I've ever seen helmets like Mizzou's before, not even at Oregon. Another Big XII defensive battle, tied at 36.
 
Upvote 0
I think the helmets look pretty bad ass.

When people make the bad defense argument I always think about OSU/Mich in 2006. Supposed to be the 2 best defenses in the country and there were 81 points scored.
 
Upvote 0
JXC;1607515; said:
I think the helmets look pretty bad ass.

Yeah, I kinda like them, too.

When people make the bad defense argument I always think about OSU/Mich in 2006. Supposed to be the 2 best defenses in the country and there were 81 points scored.

But that was one game, not a season-long trend.
 
Upvote 0
JXC;1607515; said:
When people make the bad defense argument
are you really arguing otherwise when it comes to most of this league?

When high flying offenses from ou and Texas run into good defenses out of conference, their production comes to a screeching halt.

All three Texas-OSU matchups, countless ou bowl games. Heck even Mizzou-northwestern was a big ten style game.

The big ten might not fare well in bcs level matchups... But they usually force their other bowl opponents to play their style of football.
I always think about OSU/Mich in 2006. Supposed to be the 2 best defenses in the country and there were 81 points scored.
So the exception proves the rule?


Case in point, that run by Washington :lol:
 
Upvote 0
The safety for Mizzou might kill those who bet on them. Had it been a 3 point game Mizzou would've went for the TD, the XP would make it a 4 point lead. Instead, it appears they're going for the FG and the 2 point win.
 
Upvote 0
are you really arguing otherwise when it comes to most of this league?

When high flying offenses from ou and Texas run into good defenses out of conference, their production comes to a screeching halt.

All three Texas-OSU matchups, countless ou bowl games. Heck even Mizzou-northwestern was a big ten style game.

The big ten might not fare well in bcs level matchups... But they usually force their other bowl opponents to play their style of football.

So the exception proves the rule?


Case in point, that run by Washington :lol:
I made no argument...I just said it made me think about that game. Geez...get of my back.
 
Upvote 0
The unis of Missouri are supposed to be a tribute to the Stealth Bomber fleet that is located in Missouri. I do like them. Glad MU(I go to school there and still not #1 in my book) got the W.

Mangino looked like a dead man walking there at the end. Sounds like a bunch of bull [censored] is going on there with former players though.
 
Upvote 0
Jake;1607534; said:
The safety for Mizzou might kill those who bet on them. Had it been a 3 point game Mizzou would've went for the TD, the XP would make it a 4 point lead. Instead, it appears they're going for the FG and the 2 point win.

Yeah, it nailed me. If Kansas had been sharp, they would have let the guy score on the play with about 1 minute left, when Mizzou broke a long play and got inside the 10-yard line. Kansas would have had almost a minute to tie/win the game (depanding on Mizzou's 2-pointer), similar to what Weis did last night, if they just let him score on that play. But a defensive player in the middle of a play isn't going to think like that.

Mizzou played it smart, even if Kansas was going to let the guy score on the next play. They took a couple of knees in the middle of the field, and let the game ride on a chip shot by their 96% FG kicker.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top