bassbuckeye07
Hall of Fame
LINK
Pretty good blog
Pretty good blog
The Bombshell Yahoo article covering Miami didn't even make ESPN's Top Stories....
If you're a college football fan or even just a fan of good journalism, Charles Robinson's bombshell of an article chronicling nearly a decade of rampant rules violations was potentially one of the best reads and most gripping investigative pieces in quite some time. It's a thing of beauty, and very refreshing considering a lot of the fluff that passes for news these days.
It's not just the story itself, but the depth of the reporting which apparently spanned almost a full year. This isn't Yahoo's first splash on the investigative front as they've delivered on accurately reporting and breaking stories surrounding UCONN, USC, Oregon, and to a lesser degree Ohio State whose own internal investigation seemed to find it's way to Yahoo ahead of major developments.
Yahoo is so proud of their investigative track record, they have a great landing page showcasing their past investigations as well as a more thorough breakdown of the brewing Miami scandal. If you click on that link, you'll find UNIQUE links to 65 current and former Hurricanes and the evidence tied to each one's alleged role in the scandal. There are also links with findings and evidence tying in 7 players who signed to play football elsewhere as well as findings for 10 Miami coaches, managers, and various personnel. You have to wonder what may have been on the table for the 7 players who chose not to go to Miami given they were already tapped into a booster giving them illegal benefits.
Not only is the featured article extremely potent but the 82 individual breakdowns are all very impressive. Frankly speaking I don't even think NCAA formal investigative documents have been this well organized, researched, and corroborated.
This got me thinking about just how poor of a job traditional media has become in doing investigative reporting, especially reporting on powerful programs and leagues that are a huge part of their content strategy. In fact, I contend that now more than ever, independent digital voices are the only reason any movement has occurred at all on this front.
I'll go into more details but will start with this except from Robinson's article...
"During the final game in the Orange Bowl in 2007, with the Hurricanes being embarrassed 31-0 at the half against Virginia, Shapiro, intoxicated, said he confronted Miami?s head of compliance, David Reed. According to a witness to the event, an incensed Shapiro was stalking through the Orange Bowl press box at halftime when he spotted Reed.
In a rage, Shapiro began cursing at the compliance director, calling him a ?sissy? and other derogatory names, while attempting to draw him into a fight. In Shapiro?s mind, Reed was part of the problem in a slumping Miami program, largely for what Shapiro thought was too much oversight on relationships between players and boosters. And in Shapiro?s mind, that was worth fighting picking a fistfight with the head of compliance in a crowded press box.
?It was a huge scene,? said a witness who helped pull Shapiro away on that day. ?All the people in the press box, the people sitting in the seats, they were all watching the entire thing. Nevin wanted to fight him. He was up in his face screaming. I was like ?Oh my God. He?s going to punch [Reed] in the face.??
I get that investigative reporting requires sources, time, editorial approval, and resources, but this just blows my mind. You have a BOOSTER who is oddly in the press box BERATING a compliance employee and trying to fight the individual. Apparently the ENTIRE press box of "reporters" witnessed this huge scene.
Did anyone in that press box report this incident? No. Did ESPN, who was broadcasting the game, follow up on this pretty telling episode? No. You would think a rich flashy booster often seen around town with players and coaches yelling at a university employee about being too strict on compliance would warrant someone in that press box to look into matter, but apparently not. Now I see why teams/colleges don't like to give press box credentials to bloggers. Most would have blown the whistle in a second... probably via Twitter if something like that unfolded.
The reality is that ESPN and all the other newspaper writers, TV personalities, Scout, Rivals, and radio folks in that press box that day just don't want to ruffle any feathers and bite the hand that feeds them. There is just no incentive to go after a team, college, or league's dirty laundry when a good amount of your programming and content stems from covering and promoting that institution.
That's why ESPN sits on their hands for the most part. Sure, the OJ Mayo story was solid but for years there were rumblings surrounding his recruitment to USC. Personally I had read or heard people convey details surrounding his recruitment long before ESPN was able to tie it all together.
With all the resources spanning ESPN, SI, and even the Sporting News, it's been somewhat of a revelation to see their reactions to Yahoo's real deal story. Both SI and ESPN pushed all in drilling into Ohio State hoping to strike oil. What did that investigative reporting turn up? The NCAA didn't find much as SI and ESPN for the most part relied on a couple unnamed sources who were unable to connect the story back to the program outside of the one email that the university, not the media had turned up.
Upvote
0
