• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Man Charged With Having Sex With 14-Year-Old Wife

AJHawkfan

Wanna make $14 the hard way?
Man Charged With Having Sex With 14-Year-Old Wife
Mother Approved Girl's Wedding In Kansas

POSTED: 6:24 pm EDT July 26, 2005

LINCOLN, Neb. -- A 22-year-old man faces criminal charges in Nebraska for having sex with an underage 13-year-old girl, although he legally married her in Kansas after she became pregnant.

The man's lawyer said the couple, with their families' support, "made a responsible decision to try to cope with the problem."

Matthew Koso, 22, was charged Monday with first-degree sexual assault, punishable by up to 50 years in prison. He was released on $7,500 bail pending an Aug. 17 preliminary hearing.

After the girl became pregnant, her mother gave permission in May for Koso to take the young woman to Kansas, which allows minors to get married with parental consent. The girl is now 14 and seven months pregnant.

"The idea ... is repugnant to me," said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning. "These people made the decision to send their ... 14-year-old daughter to Kansas to marry a pedophile."

He said the marriage is valid, thanks to the "ridiculous" Kansas law, "but it doesn't matter. I'm not going to stand by while a grown man ... has a relationship with a 13-year-old - now 14-year-old - girl."

Bruning, who has said he will seek a second term in 2006, has aggressively prosecuted sex crimes against children since he was elected in 2002

The couple were married in May by a judge in Hiawatha, Kan., just across the state line from Falls City.

Nebraska requires people to be at least 17 before they can marry.

Kansas law, however, sets no minimum marriage age, although case law sets the minimum age at 14 for boys and 12 for girls. The marriage must be approved by both parents or guardian, or by a district court judge, said Whitney Watson, spokesman for Kansas Attorney General Phill Kline. A judge also must approve if only one parent approves.

Koso's lawyer, Willis Yoesel, said the girl's mother and Koso's parents approved of the marriage. He said the girl's father has not lived with the family for some time.

"It seems to me like they, as much as they could, made a responsible decision to try to cope with the problem," Yoesel said.

"The families are all united in this effort," Yoesel said. "I don't know who is complaining. ... What benefit is there to anybody in the prosecution of this young man?"

There was no comment from Koso, who does not have a listed telephone number.
 
I remember a while back reading an article about a cuople who had been married 80 years. They went on and on about all they had been through, how they made their relatinoship work, all their children, grand children, great-great grand children.

The article mentioned their ages only in passing and without further comment. He was 98 and she was 92.

The standards for what is acceptable change across time and across cultures. This is nothing but political grand standing. If this couple is married and trying to make a go of it I am at a loss as to how this after-the-fact pedophile assertion is going to make things better.
 
Upvote 0
I see what you guys are saying and I agree. As long as the guy wasn't molesting her against her will....... In other words, as long as her mother didn't giver her consent to let him to marry her so she (the mother) wouldn't have to raise the kid......

Otherwise it sounds to me like the Nebraska Attorney General is just trying to get his name in the papers by insulting Kansas..... And really, what better way to get your name in the paper than insulting Kansas?
 
Upvote 0
Times and attitudes do indeed change. Up until the early 1900s it was no big deal for "women" to marry as early as 12 or 13, because they had entered the children-bearing portion of their physiological development. And since they were expected to do little less than raise the children and take care of the house, not much was though of their psychological and mental development. Back then, not as much was known about sexual deviancy as is known today. Even when I was a young teen (early '70s), sex between early teenagers wasn't vilified like it is today. Still, a relationship between 22 and 13 year olds is out of line.

Times and attitudes do indeed change. Up until the early 1900s it was no big deal for "women" to marry as early as 12 or 13, because they had entered the children-bearing portion of their physiological development. And since they were expected to do little more than raise the children and take care of the house, not much was though of their psychological and mental development. Back then, not as much was known about sexual deviancy as is known today. Even when I was a young teen (early '70s), sex between early teenagers wasn't vilified like it is today. Still, a relationship between 22 and 13 year olds is out of line.
 
Upvote 0
MililaniBuckeye said:
Times and attitudes do indeed change. Up until the early 1900s it was no big deal for "women" to marry as early as 12 or 13, because they had entered the children-bearing portion of their physiological development. And since they were expected to do little less than raise the children and take care of the house, not much was though of their psychological and mental development. Back then, not as much was known about sexual deviancy as is known today. Even when I was a young teen (early '70s), sex between early teenagers wasn't vilified like it is today. Still, a relationship between 22 and 13 year olds is out of line.

Times and attitudes do indeed change. Up until the early 1900s it was no big deal for "women" to marry as early as 12 or 13, because they had entered the children-bearing portion of their physiological development. And since they were expected to do little more than raise the children and take care of the house, not much was though of their psychological and mental development. Back then, not as much was known about sexual deviancy as is known today. Even when I was a young teen (early '70s), sex between early teenagers wasn't vilified like it is today. Still, a relationship between 22 and 13 year olds is out of line.
That's reduntantly redundant.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top