There are legit reasons to question Day and I never characterized it as cowardice.
no, instead you combined an extremely online rumor about Day passing on Ricks because he was afraid to upset team chemistry, applied it to a completely fictitious strawman about this new transfer candidate, so you could rescratch those delicious self inflicted wounds, and make sure the scratch direction also covered the "where the defense hurt me" wounds.
They've been pursuing guys at multiple positions in the portal. I would have thought that you noticed, because it setup the stud can't recruit soapbox. It's almost like rumors and hyperbole about rumors aren't the most credible ways to find fault with your team's coach. It's a really fun way to poke fun at a rival's coach (Bill martin's boat, anyone?)
They didn't bring in the extremely volatile ricks. One guy, and yet it will be years before we stop self trolling about it.
I simply make the obvious point that the "constantly transferring" Ricks wasn't seen as a big gamble by Saban. I question the chops of somebody doing the opposite of the guy who is the best. Time may prove Day right, it may not but at the moment he doesn't have the resume to go against the Saban grain and not be questioned.
the two programs aren't in remotely the same situation. One program didn't trade in their better than Alabama run of corners for a Purdue esque beater. They're finally on their way to fixing that but all of the fixes being freshmen or younger isn't the recipe for overtaking Bama.
If he had decided to go head to head for Ricks and lost him to Bama there would have been criticism and questions. Obviously. Are you suggesting he shouldn't be questioned for failing to get the job done?
because if the complaining is done first and then seeks out an outcome to fit it, like a freaking hypothetical about a northwestern defensive back, then just maybe we should look in the mirror and realize that outsiders need not bother signing up to troll OSU's soft spots, because we've got it covered ourselves.
What happened in the snow is a major part of his very short resume. There hasn't been anything else going on for years before it to help Day out. Again, is he supposed to be above reproach? Is the snow the excuse or just a point of reference?
it's a point of reference about one game that has too often been twisted into the only performance that truly counts (retroactively and in terms of projections), the exact same behavior seen across the interwebs by silent for a decade Michigan fans. The same fans who were so far past Jim's failures that they had largely just accepted they can't compete any longer with OSU.
The 2019 team was one of the greatest teams OSU has ever assembled. It was, in large part, made up of the all-time great 2017 recruiting class. The talent was inherited.
and delivered the worst defense we will ever see, thanks to the last in a crazy long list of terrible coaching hires by urban.
What he was able to do with the offense and Fields is a credit to Day. I have never questioned his chops as an Offensive Coordinator but he isn't doing that job anymore. He has a new job and like anyone doing something new, you should take a "trust but verify" approach with them until they have proven themselves. There are red flags. All is not going so well to have blind faith in Day yet.
I would classify 2020 as a draw because the had one great win and one horrific loss. If some want to look at it as a pure success have at it but the humiliation against Bama did happen.
2021 has been an abject failure. Is there really any question on that?
You spent weeks speaking as though there were not merely red flags, but instead as though there were a tidal wave of blood that may never drain out of the woody. If you'd like to start speaking in nuance, instead of extremes like this thread, I'd welcome that.