Yeah, if there's nothing better to see. It wasn't bad by any means, I just went in with pretty high expectations.3074326;1597437; said:This is depressing. Worth paying to see in theaters?
What'd you think of Angels & Demons, by the way? I find myself agreeing with you about 95% of the time.
...
NFBuck;1467519; said:'Angels & Demons'...eh, decent adaptation of one of my favorite books. As would be expected, some major plot points are altered or just dropped altogether (not unlike 'The DaVinci Code'). Biggest beef with it is that it feels rushed in some areas and some of the acting is a little stiff. Decent enough thriller that I'd have enjoyed better if I hadn't read the book first...6.5/10
NFBuck;1467587; said:I also read 'The DaVinci Code' before seeing the film and was underwhelmed when I first saw it. It grew on me after subsequent viewings. It's worth seeing, especially if you haven't read the book. There are major subplots from the novel left out (the Camerlengo's relationship with the fallen Pope, the director of CERN, a major role in the book, scrapped altogether in the film, the Illuminati character's much different and less dark, the female lead's relationship with the murdered lead scientist and co-developer of the antimatter), but that really can't be helped if they wanted to trim it to below a three hour movie. Visually, it's quite stunning with the plot built around The Vatican and various churches in Rome. Having read the novel, I always thought it would be a little difficult to adapt to the screen, and that shows in a lot of areas. I also think the plot twists were a little transparent in the movie...but then again, that may have come from reading the book first. It's worth a look IMO...decent thriller, but definately nothing groundbreaking.
Upvote
0