• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Last movie you saw?

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
jwinslow;1486202; said:
I'm pretty sure they're cavemen.
Click to expand...

They may just be nomads. I don't know for sure. In the commercials, there's a joke where George Michael is chatting up a slave girl. I'm pretty sure cavemen didn't have slaves. At any rate, I doubt they are going for historical accuracy. I've seen nothing to make me want to pay $10 to find out. Maybe they're cavemen who get trapped in ice, then unfreeze during Roman times. Now that would be funny!
 
Upvote 0
The movies timeline covers about 6000 years worth of history. It's a comedy with stupidity everywhere. The timespan that it covers is part of that stupidity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is wildly inaccurate. Which is fine. It's a comedy that's based on ludcrosity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is pure, unadulterated garbage. Which is not fine. 5.9 out of 10 on imdb, and those guys aren't nearly as critical as the rotten tomatoes posters.

I think that, at 33 years old, I might be too old to see this movie and like it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;1486232; said:
The movies timeline covers about 6000 years worth of history. It's a comedy with stupidity everywhere. The timespan that it covers is part of that stupidity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is wildly inaccurate. Which is fine. It's a comedy that's based ludcrosity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is pure, unadulterated garbage. Which is not fine. 5.9 out of 10 on imdb, and those guys aren't nearly as critical as the rotten tomatoes posters.

I think that, at 33 years old, I might be too old to see this movie and like it.
Click to expand...


Next thing I know you are going to tell me History of the World Part I wasn't spot on?

Well, I guess I am just going to have to rely on Quentin Tarantino to tell me about how WWII really was next month.
 
Upvote 0
Haven't seen either of those. Probably going to keep it that way. I don't really want to see movies that could potentially top Paul Blart for my least favorite ever. :tongue2:

The Hills Have Eyes 2 is right there with it, now that I think about it.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top