• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.
jwinslow;1486202; said:
I'm pretty sure they're cavemen.

They may just be nomads. I don't know for sure. In the commercials, there's a joke where George Michael is chatting up a slave girl. I'm pretty sure cavemen didn't have slaves. At any rate, I doubt they are going for historical accuracy. I've seen nothing to make me want to pay $10 to find out. Maybe they're cavemen who get trapped in ice, then unfreeze during Roman times. Now that would be funny!
 
Upvote 0
The movies timeline covers about 6000 years worth of history. It's a comedy with stupidity everywhere. The timespan that it covers is part of that stupidity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is wildly inaccurate. Which is fine. It's a comedy that's based on ludcrosity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is pure, unadulterated garbage. Which is not fine. 5.9 out of 10 on imdb, and those guys aren't nearly as critical as the rotten tomatoes posters.

I think that, at 33 years old, I might be too old to see this movie and like it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;1486232; said:
The movies timeline covers about 6000 years worth of history. It's a comedy with stupidity everywhere. The timespan that it covers is part of that stupidity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is wildly inaccurate. Which is fine. It's a comedy that's based ludcrosity.

From everything that I'm reading, the movie is pure, unadulterated garbage. Which is not fine. 5.9 out of 10 on imdb, and those guys aren't nearly as critical as the rotten tomatoes posters.

I think that, at 33 years old, I might be too old to see this movie and like it.


Next thing I know you are going to tell me History of the World Part I wasn't spot on?

Well, I guess I am just going to have to rely on Quentin Tarantino to tell me about how WWII really was next month.
 
Upvote 0
Haven't seen either of those. Probably going to keep it that way. I don't really want to see movies that could potentially top Paul Blart for my least favorite ever. :tongue2:

The Hills Have Eyes 2 is right there with it, now that I think about it.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top