• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Jersey / Uniform Discussion (OSU)

MaxBuck;1960858; said:
Pro Combat design innovation does not relate to appearance, it relates to function.
False. It relates to selling jerseys, otherwise we wouldn't be three years into this circus without pro combat technology incorporated into the regular OSU unis.

I get that the stitching is often (or always) going to be the same. That's no excuse for blatantly re-using the same designs across many uniforms, particularly the pants.

uniform.jpg


p-17605.jpg


lsu_pro_combat_pants.jpg


db39488e0796d62322741977c082b8e4.%20TCU_Pro_Combat_PANT_hiRes.JPG


UFL_Pro_Combat_PANT_hiRes5.jpg


I can't find a good pic of Clemson, but basically they're basically the same as the above two:

ncaa11demo514.jpg
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;1960868; said:
False. It relates to selling jerseys ...
The fact that Nike's ultimate objective is to sell jerseys doesn't mean that the whole Pro Combat series isn't geared around performance. The similarity of stitching patterns etc. flows out of the fact that those patterns support whatever performance goals Nike has set for the unis.

I agree with you about this - Nike is in business to sell gear.
 
Upvote 0
The fact that Nike's ultimate objective is to sell jerseys doesn't mean that the whole Pro Combat series isn't geared around performance.
Then why do we only get performance once a year in a novelty uniform?
The similarity of stitching patterns etc. flows out of the fact that those patterns support whatever performance goals Nike has set for the unis.
The path of least resistance is not an excuse for lack of innovation, especially if you're touting your prowess in groundbreaking new designs.

They don't HAVE to wrap around the leg and/or tailbone with almost every design. They did it because their brand was of paramount importance, not OSU's.

They wanted people to see Nike when they saw these uniforms, not individual schools.
I agree with you about this - Nike is in business to sell gear.
I'm fine with that. But if you're going to do it, do it right. Don't make fiercely unique brands like OSU/LSU into a cookie cutter advertisement for yourself.
 
Upvote 0
MaxBuck;1960885; said:
I agree with you about this - Nike is in business to sell gear.

And either Ohio State supporters buy a lot of gear or Gene Smith is always looking at multiple means for more revenue. Both are probable.

OSU is now the only school that has participated in the Pro Combat uniforms in each of the three years.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;1960898; said:
They wanted people to see Nike when they saw these uniforms, not individual schools.

... if you're going to do it, do it right. Don't make fiercely unique brands like OSU/LSU into a cookie cutter advertisement for yourself.
Well, different people seem to have different ideas as to how to "do it right." Given that we seem destined to wear these things only once a year, it shouldn't create much heartburn for anyone.
 
Upvote 0
Aren't some of the pants stuff (pads, mostly) being incorporated and used in our regular jerseys as of last year?

I also kind of view them as Nike's working version of a prototype car. Instead of just having them sit on mannequins or models that aren't actually players, they're putting them out into the field to prove that "Hey, this bulky square look we've known for the past umpteen years in jerseys and pads, we can actually change it." I really am not too terribly bothered by it, as long as the designs aren't absolutely vomit-inducing like the photochopped ones several pages back for this year. It gets the school free junk and $$$$, the kids like wearing new stuff, and the fans (some of us) like seeing new stuff and buying it.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;1960868; said:
False. It relates to selling jerseys, otherwise we wouldn't be three years into this circus without pro combat technology incorporated into the regular OSU unis.

I get that the stitching is often (or always) going to be the same. That's no excuse for blatantly re-using the same designs across many uniforms, particularly the pants.

Unfortunately the burden of responsibility lies at the feet of the school in that regard...they agreed to the contract.

Just be glad that Gene Smith hasn't figured out a way to market hot tubs yet.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top