• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
BrutusMaximus;606678; said:
Kinda the way most ISP's are.

384 is a good upload though, wish I had it.

Originally cable provided great download with poor upload while DSL provided decent capabilities both way (much slower download though). While this has evened out a bit, the origin of this issue is due to the original configuration of cable lines.

Cable was not made to accept upload information. Upload on Cable used to be ridiculously slow while download speeds destroyed DSL and other solutions. It has been altered a bit to allow a greater speed, but two things have happened: 1) cable still isn't suited to be a great upload connection; 2) cable companies don't want people hosting servers and maximizing bandwidth on their neighborhood connection.

Some argue that #2 is the main problem, whilst the cable companies continue to point to #1.
 
Upvote 0
3064374740.png
 
Upvote 0
I wish Columbus was on the list from either Google or AT&T to expand their fiber network into the city, but then I remembered the current idiot in the Mayor's office is more interested in getting an NBA franchise to the city instead.
 
Upvote 0
I'm not clicking that link because i'm not familiar with ScanMySpeed.com and the username makes me think it's not real. But, if it is real, no those speeds are horribly slow in today's market. Your bare minimum broadband speeds are generally 6mbps download speed, with most users having 10-15mbps.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top