Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
they used to crown the national champion before the bowl season too...korchiki said:just curious as to why they don't let the entire season play out before they decide the winner...people have terrible bowl games and in the end the last game of the season should matter a lot...
any thoughts???
Heisman= Best player in college football. Not best player on the best team. They have really gotten away from doing this like they should. Example= Jason White.
I have noticed that the Heisman Award has shyed away from what it once used to be. Paul Hornung of Notre Dame won it...that year Notre Dame had a losing record. That has only happened once in history where a player won it on a losing team.
Look at when Archie won it the second time, he only had what like 4 td's that year? By today's standards, there is no way he would have even been in Top-10, let alone win it. I feel the award should go to who is the best PLAYER, not who has the best stats.
So yes the player should have good stats and his team should have a good record. But that is not why the Heisman award was started for. It was started to give a award to the best college football player, not who plays for the best team.
This year they will finally get it right for the first time in a while and actually give it to the best player in the nation...Reggie Bush.
archie had a decent fullback who might have been a first rounder paving the way for him who took all his tds. you are thirce as stupid as i thought you were if youdont think archie should have won his second DAC trophy.tedginn05 said:I have noticed that the Heisman Award has shyed away from what it once used to be. Paul Hornung of Notre Dame won it...that year Notre Dame had a losing record. That has only happened once in history where a player won it on a losing team.
Look at when Archie won it the second time, he only had what like 4 td's that year? By today's standards, there is no way he would have even been in Top-10, let alone win it. I feel the award should go to who is the best PLAYER, not who has the best stats.
So yes the player should have good stats and his team should have a good record. But that is not why the Heisman award was started for. It was started to give a award to the best college football player, not who plays for the best team.
This year they will finally get it right for the first time in a while and actually give it to the best player in the nation...Reggie Bush.
archie had a decent fullback who might have been a first rounder paving the way for him who took all his tds. you are thirce as stupid as i thought you were if youdont think archie should have won his second DAC trophy.
Reggie Bush, hands down. He could possibly be one of the best players in college football history. Image if he was the featured back for them. Lendale White takes away at least 12 carries a game from him. I'm afraid they might give it Leinart, just because he won it last year. I thought that the same thing would happen with Jason White, though. Thank God I was wrong.
Reggie Bush, hands down. He could possibly be one of the best players in college football history. Image if he was the featured back for them. Lendale White takes away at least 12 carries a game from him. I'm afraid they might give it Leinart, just because he won it last year. I thought that the same thing would happen with Jason White, though. Thank God I was wrong.