DaveyBoy;1994585; said:
1. this team is more talented than the 2004 team...by far...except at QB
You think this team is far more talented than the '04 team? I'm not so sure about that. Consider some of the players that were on that roster (and not all of these guys were starters at the time, though many were, but like a lot of the guys who are being thrust into prominence due to circumstances on the current squad, they were raw and inexperienced). At LB, AJ Hawk and Bobby Carpenter. At WR, Santonio Holmes, Ted Ginn, Anthony Gonzalez, and Roy Hall. At RB/FB, Antonio Pittman and Branden Joe. At DL, Mike Kudla, Quinn Pitcock, Simon Fraser, and Vernon Gholston. At OL, Nick Mangold, Rob Sims, Kirk Barton, TJ Downing, and Doug Datish. At DB, Justin Fox, Ashton Youboty, Tyler Everett, and Nate Salley. Having Mike Nugent as kicker certainly didn't hurt. That's an incomplete list, but it's a talented list, of players who were (or would become) good-to-exceptional. And yet, the team at that time was mediocre at best, winning some ugly games early, and getting absolutely throttled by a merely decent Iowa team, in what was a far more thorough beat-down than what we saw last night.
Talented but inexperienced teams can go from barely mediocre to highly dangerous over the course of a season. The 2004 team did it. The 2011 team has similar talent, similar (in)experience, and similar early difficulties at quarterback. The return of Herron, Adams, and Posey will obviously help. But the team has to get the quarterback situation sorted out (or perhaps, more accurately, Miller has to develop a comfort level where he can use his abilities without making rookie mistakes, as Troy Smith had to do in '04). But I think there's a good chance it will click at some point this year, and this team will go from being barely mediocre, to being very dangerous. Just as the '04 team did, with a very similar talent/experience profile.