korchiki
Hall of Fame
quick question...is there a difference between the college ball and high school???and if so would he have trouble with the transition???
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is no way I'm going to give a lot of credit to the staff for the performance of Nugent, Groom, Sander, and Huston. Both Nugent and Huston sucked in 2001, so the staff's magic evidently didn't work then. Nugent attributed his phenomenal improvement in 2002 mostly to off-season practice and his time with Janakievski. Huston observed and worked with Nugent and Janakievski during that time and improved greatly as well. Groom was also a hard worker who got where he did with repetition. Sander was bad in 2002 (thus the nicknames "B.J. Shanker", "Der Shankmeister", and "Sir Shanksalot"). His time with the staff then didn't help him much...he, too greatly improved over the course of an off-season due to intense dedication and practice. If our staff is so great in "developing" kickers, why wasn't Turano a top punter last year (he was very good, but not elite). Same with Trappaso...he's doing well but he's not quite at Groom's or Sander's level. And why can't Huston hit from 50+ despite being absolutely deadly from about 45 in and with a howitzer for a leg? You may say that the staff can't do everything, and that's part of my point. This is not to say our staff can't help our kickers significantly improve, but rather to say that we shouldn't rely solely on them for the final performance of our kickers...if any one position needs to be learned on its own, it's the kicking position.
No team in college football depends on its kickers like we do...we don't have the luxury of hoping that the staff can develop kickers. Coaching only goes so far. If you have the chance at getting a kid who kicks 50+ yard FGs with consistency, you get him...period.
And why can't Huston hit from 50+ despite being absolutely deadly from about 45 in and with a howitzer for a leg?
Mili, is it fair to expect everyone to be Nugents, Grooms, or Sanders though? I think what we have is just fine. The coaches have to be given some credit.
JohnnyCockfight said:Sorry for the off-topic, but it's unfair to mischaracterize Huston as being unable to hit FGs from 50+ yards. His long misses have all, from what I've seen, been lined up on the right hash. Nugent missed those from time to time as well. Reference the national championship game, when Nugent missed a 42-yarder that was lined up on the right, the ramifications of which could have been the difference between winning and losing. Huston has been unbelievably good this year.
perhaps, but what school has come even close to what we have done? Perhaps it was outside help that turned the corner for Nuge and others, but the staff still gets credit for bringing in those players and developing them in our system, especially when you consider the extra time we devote to ST during practices.That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying you can't rely on "developing" kickers.
This kid would be starting here next fall, no doubt. Just imagine how good he'd be if he's already kicking 50+ field goals and touchbacks.
perhaps, but what school has come even close to what we have done?Is it because of "what we have done", or is it because we were lucky to have gotten Nugent and Huston? I'm thinking it's more the latter.
perhaps, but what school has come even close to what we have done?Is it because of "what we have done", or is it because we were lucky to have gotten Nugent and Huston? I'm thinking it's more the latter.
Like my dear old Ma-In-Law used to say when the Buckeyes were having FG kicking woes in earlier years
"There's over 50,000 kids down there, you'd think one of them that can kick a ball would be able to walk-on right now!"
Kicking is such an intrinsic talent that having the right kid turn up is critical. Nuge turned up, so did Huston. Should Wright follow in this line that may make for 3 excellent kickers in a row. At some point I stop calling that luck, whether that's at 3 in a row or later I don't know.
Regardless, luck only takes you so far in this game, surely? Having the kid with those sheer physical skills is one thing. Getting the timing down, the snap, the hold, laces were they need to be, all those mechanics coaches can help kickers and their holders work on.
But, when all is said and done there is a reason why folks kid about kickers being mental - for a lot of it is decided in the head. They are performing an unnatural act on an eccentric shape, using a malleable hammer - the human foot. I'd say for those with frail self-image it'd be a poor choice of career, worse than pro golf. Wide Left, Wide Right happens on makeable distances when the kicker is primed to think of failure. Game-Winners happen when they are free of those thoughts and just focus on the task at hand.
Perhaps as much as anything Huston and Nuge's improvement was about getting into the right frame of mind.
I'm thinking its b/c we devote more schollies to kickers/punters than most teams. We were fortunate to have this level of success, but having a solid kicking game is no accident.Is it because of "what we have done", or is it because we were lucky to have gotten Nugent and Huston? I'm thinking it's more the latter.