FIFYresidentmfan;2246286; said:This ordeal really has Hoke questioning his strict no visit policy. Oh well.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
FIFYresidentmfan;2246286; said:This ordeal really has Hoke questioning his strict no visit policy. Oh well.
WolverineMike;2246443; said:I doubt he's rethinking anything because of losing a couple recruits.
rock454;2246449; said:Doesn't Urban have the same strategy or is that only if kids want to visit tsun? I remember seeing that he told Dunn last year that if he took a visit then he wasn't committed to tOSU anymore, seems like it happened w/ one of the commits this year too. I think it's a smart strategy, if the school isn't out shopping to replace the commit, the commit shouldn't be shopping to replace the school. It allows the coach to put his energy into finishing the class rather than having to fight just to keep kids on board, just so happens that Hoke's commits aren't quite as sold...
WolverineMike;2246456; said:These last two have not been a question of being "sold." A big problem with them was they committed before they blew up and a lot of suitors come calling. It's hard for a kid to stay committed, in IMO, when one day he has Michigan and CMU, EMU, and Cincinnati, offers, and then 2 months later has offers from osu, Oklahoma, LSU, and Florida.
They want to be wined and dined by the big time programs, Which may not had been calling when they originally verbaled. Which is totally understandable.
WolverineMike;2246475; said:true dat. But oh well. 1 or 2 kids isn't going to make or break the class.
rock454;2246449; said:Doesn't Urban have the same strategy or is that only if kids want to visit tsun? I remember seeing that he told Dunn last year that if he took a visit then he wasn't committed to tOSU anymore, seems like it happened w/ one of the commits this year too. I think it's a smart strategy, if the school isn't out shopping to replace the commit, the commit shouldn't be shopping to replace the school. It allows the coach to put his energy into finishing the class rather than having to fight just to keep kids on board, just so happens that Hoke's commits aren't quite as sold...
WolverineMike;2246475; said:true dat. But oh well. 1 or 2 kids isn't going to make or break the class.
Hodgepodge;2246525; said:Bringing this back to Dawson, I'm not a fan of Hoke's policy if it is enforced in a way that precludes Dawson from signing with them if he so chooses. There are ways of handling this that don't include such a hard-edged, do-or-don't rule.
ScriptOhio;2246558; said:No, losing an OL won't break the class; however, the consequences of a loss could depend on the position. Losing a "franchise" QB could have dire consequences. Does anyine think Ohio State be 9-0 this year wthout Braxton Miller? Whatever scUM's record was the last few years, it would have been a lot worse without shoelaces, etc.
rock454;2246449; said:...if the school isn't out shopping to replace the commit, the commit shouldn't be shopping to replace the school.
AJHawkfan;2246891; said:Agree 100%. The rule might seem harsh, but honestly, I don't have a problem with it. If you're ready to commit, then commit. If you aren't sure, then don't commit.