• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Concussions, CTE, and other traumatic brain injuries in football

Redhawk

All-American
  • Dead athletes' brains show damage from concussions - CNN.com

    (CNN) -- For years after his NFL career ended, Ted Johnson could barely muster the energy to leave his house. "I'd [leave to] go see my kids for maybe 15 minutes," said Johnson. "Then I would go back home and close the curtains, turn the lights off and I'd stay in bed. That was my routine for two years. "Those were bad days."

    These days, the former linebacker is less likely to recount the hundreds of tackles, scores of quarterback sacks or the three Super Bowl rings he earned as a linebacker for the New England Patriots. He is more likely to talk about suffering more than 100 concussions. "I can definitely point to 2002 when I got back-to-back concussions. That's where the problems started," said Johnson, who retired after those two concussions. "The depression, the sleep disorders and the mental fatigue."

    Until recently, the best medical definition for concussion was a jarring blow to the head that temporarily stunned the senses, occasionally leading to unconsciousness. It has been considered an invisible injury, impossible to test -- no MRI, no CT scan can detect it.

    But today, using tissue from retired NFL athletes culled posthumously, the Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy (CSTE), at the Boston University School of Medicine, is shedding light on what concussions look like in the brain. The findings are stunning. Far from innocuous, invisible injuries, concussions confer tremendous brain damage. That damage has a name: chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

    On Tuesday afternoon, researchers at the CSTE released a study about the sixth documented case of CTE in former NFL player Tom McHale, who died in 2008 at the age of 45, and the youngest case to date, an 18-year-old multi-sport athlete who suffered multiple concussions.

    While CTE in an ex-NFL player's brain may have been expected, the beginnings of brain damage in an 18-year-old brain was a "shocking" finding, according to Dr. Ann McKee, a neuropathologist at the Veterans Administration Hospital in Bedford, Massachusetts, and co-director of the CSTE. "We think this is how chronic traumatic encephalopathy starts," said McKee. "This is speculation, but I think we can assume that this would have continued to expand."

    CTE has thus far been found in the brains of six out of six former NFL players. "What's been surprising is that it's so extensive," said McKee. "It's throughout the brain, not just on the superficial aspects of the brain, but it's deep inside."

    CSTE studies reveal brown tangles flecked throughout the brain tissue of former NFL players who died young -- some as early as their 30s or 40s.
    McKee, who also studies Alzheimer's disease, says the tangles closely resemble what might be found in the brain of an 80-year-old with dementia.
    "I knew what traumatic brain disease looked like in the very end stages, in the most severe cases," said McKee. "To see the kind of changes we're seeing in 45-year-olds is basically unheard of." The damage affects the parts of the brain that control emotion, rage, hypersexuality, even breathing, and recent studies find that CTE is a progressive disease that eventually kills brain cells.

    Chris Nowinski knows well the impact of concussions. He was a football star at Harvard before wrestling professionally with World Wrestling Entertainment. In one moment, his dreams of a long career wrestling were dashed by a kick to his chin. That kick, which caused Nowinski to black out and effectively ended his career, capped a career riddled with concussions.

    "My world changed," said Nowinski. "I had depression. I had memory problems. My head hurt for five years." Nowinski began searching for studies, and what he found startled him. "I realized when I was visiting a lot of doctors, they weren't giving me very good answers about what was wrong with my head," said Nowinski. "I read [every study I could find] and I realized there was a ton of evidence showing concussions lead to depression, and multiple concussion can lead to Alzheimer's." Nowinski decided further study was needed, so he founded the Sports Legacy Institute along with Dr. Robert Cantu, a neurosurgeon and the co-director of the CSTE. The project solicits for study the brains of ex-athletes who suffered multiple concussions.

    Once a family agrees to donate the brain, it is delivered to scientists at the CSTE to look for signs of damage. So far, the evidence of CTE is compelling.

    The Center for the Study of Traumatic Encephalopathy, along with other research institutions, has now identified traumatic encephalopathy in the brains of late NFL football players John Grimsley, Mike Webster, Andre Waters, Justin Strzelczyk and Terry Long, in addition to McHale.

    Grimsley died of an accidental gunshot wound to the chest. Webster, Long and Strzelczyk all died after long bouts of depression, while Waters committed suicide in 2006 at age 44. McHale was found dead last year of an apparent drug overdose. "Guys were dying," said Nowinski. "The fact of the matter was guys were dying because they played sports 10 or 20 years before." So far, around 100 athletes have consented to have their brains studied after they die.

    Ted Johnson was one of the first to sign up. He said he believes that concussions he suffered while playing football explain the anger, depression and throbbing headaches that occasionally still plague him. Johnson said he played through concussions because he, like many other NFL athletes, did not understand the consequences. He has publicly criticized the NFL for not protecting players like him."They don't want you to know," said Johnson. "It's not like when you get into the NFL there's a handout that says 'These are the effects of multiple concussions so beware.' "

    In a statement, the NFL indicated that their staffs take a cautious, conservative approach to managing concussions. While they support research into the impact of concussions, they maintain that, "Hundreds of thousands of people have played football and other sports without experiencing any problem of this type and there continues to be considerable debate within the medical community on the precise long-term effects of concussions and how they relate to other risk factors."

    The NFL is planning its own independent medical study of retired NFL players on the long-term effects of concussion. "Really my main reason even for talking about this is to help the guys who are already retired," said Johnson. "[They] are getting divorced, going bankrupt, can't work, are depressed, and don't know what's wrong with them. [It is] to give them a name for it so they can go get help." "The idea that you can whack your head hundreds of times in your life and knock yourself out and get up and be fine is gone," said Nowinski. "We know we can't do that anymore. This causes long-term damage."

    Surprise.
     
    The Columbus Dispatch - News
    NEW YORK (AP) -- The days of a football player getting his bell rung, taking a whiff of smelling salts and getting back on the field are gone.
    Florida quarterback Tim Tebow can attest to that. The Heisman Trophy winner took a hard hit to the head and chest by a Kentucky lineman and had the back of his head driven into the knee of a teammate. The concussion he received put him in the hospital for a night and left his status for No. 1 Florida's huge game against No. 4 LSU on Saturday in doubt.
    "The concussion in the past was called a ding, a so-called minor injury," said Dr. Julian Bailes, the chair of West Virginia University's department of neurosurgery. "The last five years there has been more research and understanding on how they occur and how we take care of them."
    A spate of studies - including one commissioned by the NFL and released last week that found retired professional football players may have a higher rate than normal of Alzheimer's disease and other memory problems - have gained widespread attention in recent years. There's even a new law in Washington state, setting out conditions for how head injuries are to be dealt with in sports.
    With this backdrop, football is changing how it deals with blows to the head.
    How much? In 1994, after sustaining a concussion, former NFL fullback Merril Hoge says he was cleared to play over the phone by a doctor who was not a neurologist.
    A few weeks later, Hoge suffered another concussion he says almost killed him because he came back from the first too soon. It ended his playing career and to this day he still deals with post-concussion syndrome.
    The plight of former NFL players such as Hoge is part of what has led to the increased scrutiny today. Major college teams seem to be getting the message.
    ...

    kind of interesting. not much that the avid fan doesnt know. however i find it odd that the casual fan doesnt understand the results of a concussion. post concussion syndrome can last days, weeks even months. as a hockey and football fan you see it a lot, it ruins careers. and even further lives. advances have gone a long way in better head equipment, though to some respect that has led to more "reckless" use of the head as a weapon. weve seen better diagnosis and implementation of impact testing. however that is only part of it.

    i might be in a slim group to glad to see the big ten has shown willingness to crack down on headshots. while i realize it is a contact sport football (and hockey) can both be played with headhunting. on the other hand you have to protect the players (to some extent) while allowing a physical contest to persist. its a fine line, and i think be it delany (in the b10) or campbell [bettman] (in the nhl) significant but not vindictive punishment occur. in both sports id like to see a few more of the no doubt dirty/late/high and intent to injure type hits/shots be brought to light. i for one applaud delany for his willingness to not stand firm on a kid who was in the wrong, one who was second team all conference, and not hide cowardly behind that. while some may call delany's actions spurious, i do not. at this point, the one thing moving forward will be consistency of the rules and consistent application.


    Post-concussion syndrome - MayoClinic.com
    ImPACT Test
     
    Upvote 0
    jimotis4heisman;1560096; said:
    The Columbus Dispatch - News


    kind of interesting. not much that the avid fan doesnt know. however i find it odd that the casual fan doesnt understand the results of a concussion. post concussion syndrome can last days, weeks even months. as a hockey and football fan you see it a lot, it ruins careers. and even further lives. advances have gone a long way in better head equipment, though to some respect that has led to more "reckless" use of the head as a weapon. weve seen better diagnosis and implementation of impact testing. however that is only part of it.

    i might be in a slim group to glad to see the big ten has shown willingness to crack down on headshots. while i realize it is a contact sport football (and hockey) can both be played with headhunting. on the other hand you have to protect the players (to some extent) while allowing a physical contest to persist. its a fine line, and i think be it delany (in the b10) or campbell [bettman] (in the nhl) significant but not vindictive punishment occur. in both sports id like to see a few more of the no doubt dirty/late/high and intent to injure type hits/shots be brought to light. i for one applaud delany for his willingness to not stand firm on a kid who was in the wrong, one who was second team all conference, and not hide cowardly behind that. while some may call delany's actions spurious, i do not. at this point, the one thing moving forward will be consistency of the rules and consistent application.


    Post-concussion syndrome - MayoClinic.com
    ImPACT Test

    I stand with JO4H. Let them at it, but protect the scholar athletes from cheap shots to the head that cripple them for life.
     
    Upvote 0
    im all for protecting the player. but at some point we need to remember that this is a contact sport. you almost need to throw the flag based on intent. helmet to helmet in and of itself really shouldn't be a penalty. lets be honest with ourselves here, it happens ON EVERY PLAY. where do you think those dings, scratches and other colors on the helmets are coming from?? if you have helmet to helmet contact where the player leads with his facemask its pretty clear the player is simply trying to make a play and not trying to hurt someone. anytime you hit someone with the crown of your helmet your doing it wrong and im fine with that being a penalty. but before you can throw a flag you need to not only be able to explain what the player did wrong, but you also need to have an answer for what the player should have done. if you don't have both, its not a penalty in my book.

    if we continue the way we are were only a few years away from playing flag football. coleman's hit and the msu hit are perfect examples of this. neither play was dead and if the offensive player had fallen forward he would have been given the extra yardage. but because the defensive player hit him... well thats a penalty. what are you supposed to tell the guys playing defense in that situation? the play isn't dead, the offensive player is still struggling for yardage but you can't touch him? you have to what? wait to see if he breaks free from the tackle? do you have to give him 2 seconds to regain his balance as well? does he have to see you before you can make contact? wouldn't want to blind side him and hit a "defensless player". we're already to the point where its illegal to make contact within 2 yards of the sidelines.
     
    Upvote 0
    the msu hit are perfect examples of this

    I watched that game today - the ref signaled a dead ball penalty when the MSU guy hit the TSUN receiver that was wrapped up but still struggling for yardage.

    With that signal, there must have been a whistle before the hit. Then I understand the penalty - there were two guys hanging onto the receiver, and a judgment that forward progress was stopped would have been reasonable. I couldn't hear a whistle, but if the dead ball signal was a correct one, then that call is understandable.
     
    Upvote 0
    BB73;1560729; said:
    I watched that game today - the ref signaled a dead ball penalty when the MSU guy hit the TSUN receiver that was wrapped up but still struggling for yardage.

    With that signal, there must have been a whistle before the hit. Then I understand the penalty - there were two guys hanging onto the receiver, and a judgment that forward progress was stopped would have been reasonable. I couldn't hear a whistle, but if the dead ball signal was a correct one, then that call is understandable.
    I cannot imagine there was a whistle. I couldn't hear one either, and the WR is still fighting for yards, suggesting to me that if there was a whistle it was all but simultaneous with the hit.
     
    Upvote 0
    Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1560740; said:
    I cannot imagine there was a whistle. I couldn't hear one either, and the WR is still fighting for yards, suggesting to me that if there was a whistle it was all but simultaneous with the hit.

    I'm not trying to say the Spartan made a bad play. I'm just stating that according to the signal given, the refs apparently considered it to be a late hit, and not a helmet-to-helmet infraction, which is the main thrust of this thread.

    Heck, I was still fired up when I saw the flag today - but after seeing the 'dead ball' signal, I calmed down some. :wink2:
     
    Upvote 0
    Much like the advancements in the treatment of players with possible back and neck injuries, it is rather impossible to argue that adapting the rules and the medical treatment to recent advances in knowledge and technology isn't a good and necessary thing. Players like Adam Taliaferro would have been paralyzed even 10 years before he was hurt, so every success story like his reminds everyone that the health of athletes is of the utmost importance.

    All that said, they players were helmets to protect their heads, and can't possible avoid hitting another player with it when making a hit of any kind. Can you imagine telling a linebacker "Yeah, there's Brandon Jacobs, all 260 pounds of him...go tackle him, but make sure you don't touch him with your helmet". Impossible. Spearing is vile, dangerous (moreso for the spearer than the spearee, actually), and has no place in the game. Understanding the consequences of concussions can also easily lead us to try and eliminate "headhunting" as much as possible as well. However, collisions happen, even head to head collisions, and it will be more dangerous for the players if they are hitting and tackling awkwardly to try and avoid that than to use the same fundamentals they've been taught since they started playing. I agree with eliminating head-hunting, but I think they've gone too far in cracking down on hits on supposedly defenseless players and routine QB hits myself.
     
    Upvote 0
    One of my buddies just had his third concussion the other week in the past two years, and he was a guy with a college scholarship that he's having to turn down because of them.

    Another one is still playing college ball as a freshman this year, and he's had an untold amount of concussions, at least four confirmed.
     
    Upvote 0
    martinss01;1560582; said:
    im all for protecting the player. but at some point we need to remember that this is a contact sport. you almost need to throw the flag based on intent. helmet to helmet in and of itself really shouldn't be a penalty. lets be honest with ourselves here, it happens ON EVERY PLAY. where do you think those dings, scratches and other colors on the helmets are coming from?? if you have helmet to helmet contact where the player leads with his facemask its pretty clear the player is simply trying to make a play and not trying to hurt someone. anytime you hit someone with the crown of your helmet your doing it wrong and im fine with that being a penalty. but before you can throw a flag you need to not only be able to explain what the player did wrong, but you also need to have an answer for what the player should have done. if you don't have both, its not a penalty in my book.

    if we continue the way we are were only a few years away from playing flag football. coleman's hit and the msu hit are perfect examples of this. neither play was dead and if the offensive player had fallen forward he would have been given the extra yardage. but because the defensive player hit him... well thats a penalty. what are you supposed to tell the guys playing defense in that situation? the play isn't dead, the offensive player is still struggling for yardage but you can't touch him? you have to what? wait to see if he breaks free from the tackle? do you have to give him 2 seconds to regain his balance as well? does he have to see you before you can make contact? wouldn't want to blind side him and hit a "defensless player". we're already to the point where its illegal to make contact within 2 yards of the sidelines.

    Bucklion;1560759; said:
    Much like the advancements in the treatment of players with possible back and neck injuries, it is rather impossible to argue that adapting the rules and the medical treatment to recent advances in knowledge and technology isn't a good and necessary thing. Players like Adam Taliaferro would have been paralyzed even 10 years before he was hurt, so every success story like his reminds everyone that the health of athletes is of the utmost importance.

    All that said, they players were helmets to protect their heads, and can't possible avoid hitting another player with it when making a hit of any kind. Can you imagine telling a linebacker "Yeah, there's Brandon Jacobs, all 260 pounds of him...go tackle him, but make sure you don't touch him with your helmet". Impossible. Spearing is vile, dangerous (moreso for the spearer than the spearee, actually), and has no place in the game. Understanding the consequences of concussions can also easily lead us to try and eliminate "headhunting" as much as possible as well. However, collisions happen, even head to head collisions, and it will be more dangerous for the players if they are hitting and tackling awkwardly to try and avoid that than to use the same fundamentals they've been taught since they started playing. I agree with eliminating head-hunting, but I think they've gone too far in cracking down on hits on supposedly defenseless players and routine QB hits myself.


    maybe im alone, im not saying "blow to the head" as just a typical generic play. my reference to originally "headshots" and then narrowed that to "headhunting." personally their is no clear demarcation of "headhunting" rather often times it is difficult to decipher. that being said often times hits are clearly malicious in nature. this isnt about the run of the mill token call. my reference is to the blatant intent to injure. not the sisification of the game, let them play, let them hit. but theirs an element that i cant stand.


    im not talking garden variety hits. or hard hits. im talking dirty hits, malicious hits.

    i was at the game, i called colemans hit dirty at the time. im probably alone on that one. i when i rewatch it im not sure. hard to say suspension or not. but if thats the rule applied across the board then fine. id be fired up if pryor took that hit... toss in colemans reaction. open actual review of it, well i dunno.

    but i will say that their is a malicious level that should and needs to be called.


    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-PTEr78pcs]YouTube - Kurt Coleman commits flagrant penalty vs. Illinois[/ame]
     
    Upvote 0
    Back
    Top