• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

college teams v. NFL teams

Resident old fart checking in here: From 1934 to 1976 The Chicago Tribune hosted the College All Star football game. A squad of All American seniors were pitted against the previous year's NFL Champs. By the 70's the professional game was becoming just that; a much more evolved game, a year round vocation with conditioning, film study, mandatory out-of-season workouts replacing the take-a-two-month-job-on-construction-to-get-in-shape-for-the-season lifestyle.

This was a college team of seniors, filled with many of the top draft picks of the NFL, not a single college team where you might well have a freshman or a sophomore going up against a 28 - 29 year old established pro.

Toward the end of the series the All Stars were getting creamed every game , but there had been some upsets and some very close games in the history of the game. I think it was a Miami U. grad Bob Jenk's field goal that either beat or tied a mid 60's Packer's team that brought about the wrath of Vince Lombardi and led to the demise of the game.

What had become obvious was that the coaches could not impart enough offensive or defensive knowledge in the two weeks the All Stars had to prepare. Further, NFL teams hated loosing their top draft picks for those two weeks. In short, the rising professionalism of the NFL killed the game.

My own opinion is that the age, size and speed along with the cohesion that any given pro team should have would make them proibitive favorites in a match up against the very best of college football... but I'd be tempted to take the spread if it was the All Stars against the Cardinals or the pre-Marvin Lewis Bengals.
 
Upvote 0
The WRs and RBs would have the fresh legs, but the lines would get eaten alive. Even if you took a great college team-02 Miami-and kept them together for 5 years past college as an NFL team, they would still have significant holes-would you really want Ken Dorsey as your QB, or Quad Hill as your FB? Football players bloom later than any other sport, due to growth spurts, motivation, and, simply, later development. You could take an all 1-AA and lower All Star team of NFL vets and they would kill USC or Oklahoma or Miami.
 
Upvote 0
USC or UT would set the record for largest margin of defeat in NFL history and would have a 0 chance of winning one game.

The Houston Texans would beat them by at least 40 points.

I agree about the 40 points thing, but the Bears won the 1940 NFL Championship game, 73-0 over Washington. So the 'largest margin of defeat in NFL history' might be safe.
 
Upvote 0
Every professional player in all of the major sports, without exception, has always said that the best college team could never, ever compete with the worst pro team. I think they would know more than internet Texas fans.

I don't think that is true anymore with basketball. Witness the Toronto Raptor's loss to Maccabi Tel Aviv last week.
 
Upvote 0
Not sure why I'm chiming in. I'm pretty much in agreement with most everyone who has posted. The speed and size of the NFL chews up and spits out any college team. I would encourage people to attend a college game on Saturday and then a pro game on Sunday(back to back days helps keep everything fresh in your mind), and then say they think a college team could win at the pro level.

The post about basketball is an entirely different debate. B-ball only has 5 people playing where football has 22 playing unless a couple of people go both ways. Talent thins out when you have so many spots to fill, plus execution and play memorization come into play. B-ball can pretty much be won by any group if they have decent talent and know how to play together.
 
Upvote 0
i was just over at hornfans.com and saw a thread talkin about the 2005 longhorns being able to beat some NFL teams

their team does look more and more stacked and physically dominant as the season goes along but I don't think any college team has a chance against any pro team on its worst day. first of all the talent of an NFL team is much higher than anyone in college no matter how stacked a team may be.

Like High, also not seeing the thread, this sounds like a sarcastic thread making fun of the Sooners as each of the last few years whenever they start out bad ass, they talk about how they can beat an NFL, etc, etc.

I am sure some of the posters don't realize the mockery of the sooners fans, and either post to say how ridiculous it is, or in some cases talk about how they could hang with the Texans or 49ers.

Until a college team has all of their starters drafted #1-#22 and their kicker drafted in the first three rounds, this argument is undeniably ignorant.
 
Upvote 0
I understand that it's a different debate. My remark was in response to BuckLion's post that the premise was true for all sports.

Clyde Drexler was one of the main people I remember putting this forth while he was still playing. Given the fact that many NBA teams are now full of high school kids and one-year college players, it's tempting for me to agree with you...but, I think the college game has deteriorated significantly in the last 10-15 years as well as the pro game has. So, I don't think a college team would have any chance of beating any professional team from a major country (here or otherwise) with a major professional basketball league...heck, the NBA guys can't even win a gold medal game anymore. So, though I agree it is much more clouded in basketball, I think the college game has declined too.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top