College Footballs Top 12 Dynasties

[bucks4me]

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/multimedia/photo_gallery/2005/12/25/gallery.dynasty/content.1.html?cnn=yes

Do you agree?

 

[High Lonesome]

its not terrible but i would put the '67-'70 longhorns on there before the '48-'51 sooners. 34 game win streak and 2 MNC should go before 31 and 1 MNC I also think that if usc beats texas they should be moved higher than #3. Probably #1. I guess the question is what is more impressive, 3 ap titles or a 47 game win streak. Each would be amazing

 

[7 45 33 48]

In my opinion you have to win more than 1 NC over a span of 4 or 5 years to be considered a dynasty. They should have stopped at the top 10, the last 2 are questionable to be on there. It is a shame Ohio State lost the last game in 1969, 1970, 1974, and 1975 (and I could argue the 1973 team deserved at least a share) to cost them the NC. That would have been 5 NC's in 8 years and would have been the greatest dynasty of all time.

 

[scarletandgrey]

In my opinion you have to win more than 1 NC over a span of 4 or 5 years to be considered a dynasty. They should have stopped at the top 10, the last 2 are questionable to be on there. It is a shame Ohio State lost the last game in 1969, 1970, 1974, and 1975 (and I could argue the 1973 team deserved at least a share) to cost them the NC. That would have been 5 NC's in 8 years and would have been the greatest dynasty of all time.

True but you got to win to be in if you know what I mean. We are a gret football school and eventually we will be on that list.