• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

College Football Playoffs Expansion Discussion

I've lobbied since the beginning for 16. 4 regional conferences of 16 teams each. 2 from each conference and 8 at large from best left. Finish the season no later than the 8th, holiday break or whatever you want to call it.

North, South, East and West or whatever you want to name it. It's already freaking NFL lite just cut the bullshit and lets do this!

Kicker, is you throw in football relegation like Premier League soccer. If you suck, we dint want you. Next team up!

Just sayin': The B1G and SEC would never agree to that. Those 2 conferences have the vast majority of the better teams are are getting a disproportionally larger share of all the TV contract money. Money is power too which is why they currently have "control" over the CFPs. There is no way they would give up that and be willing share this money with all the lesser teams in the other 2 conferences (i.e. ACC and BIG XII).
 
Upvote 0

Ryan Day Says 24-Team CFP Would Be Great for College Football But “Debatable Whether It’s Best for Ohio State”

Ryan Day knows a 24-team College Football Playoff would be great for the 137 teams in the Football Bowl Subdivision. But there’s a 138th team that may not stand to gain much, if anything.

“It’s debatable whether it’s best for Ohio State — you can go back and forth on that — but it’s certainly best for the conference and great for college football in general,” Day told ESPN’s Adam Rittenberg on Monday. “It engages more fan bases late in the season.”

If a 24-team CFP had existed since the start of the BCS era in 1998, Ohio State would have made the playoff in 26 of 28 seasons. The only other program in the same ballpark was Georgia, which would have made 23 appearances. Alabama, Oklahoma and LSU each would have made 21 appearances, while Florida (20), Penn State (19), Oregon (19), Michigan (19), Clemson (18), Texas (18) and Wisconsin (17) also would have been frequent participants.

Dan Lanning, who has led Oregon to back-to-back CFP appearances (including one as the No. 1 overall seed in 2024), agreed with Day that the Ducks don’t necessarily benefit from a larger postseason field. Still, he compared the 24-team format to March Madness and said it would be “good for our sport.”

“Ryan’s in the same similar situation, (Indiana coach) Curt (Cignetti) as well, similar situation,” Lanning told Rittenberg. “Is it necessarily best for the programs that have been in to say, ‘Hey, let’s invite more?’ No, but is it better? What happened because of the College Football Playoff is every bowl game has been devalued, the end of the season looks completely different. You’re a failure as a coach if you don’t make it to the College Football Playoff. … It’s going to create more opportunity. Just like March Madness is great in the spring for basketball, it’ll be good for our sport.”

As Day continues to chew on the proposed format, he wonders how much more difficult it could become for Ohio State to win its 10th national championship somewhere down the road.

“When there was four (teams), you just had to win two games,” Day said. “Now there’s more games to be played, there’s a bigger pool, a bigger field. But when you take a step away from it, you’re always going to be late in the season, playing for an opportunity to be the highest seed that you can be.”
.
.
.
continued

Big Ten’s 18 Schools, Commissioner Tony Petitti Unanimously Support 24-Team CFP: “We Feel Strongly About It”

The Big Ten has made its stance clear: Bigger is better when it comes to the College Football Playoff.

During an hour-long meeting with reporters at the Big Ten meetings in Rancho Palos Verdes, California, commissioner Tony Petitti said all 18 conference schools unanimously support expanding the CFP to 24 teams — a format that would dramatically reshape the postseason and further cement the Big Ten’s influence over the future of college football.

“That’s having been incredibly successful in the 12-team format,” Petitti said, per The Athletic’s Scott Dochterman. “The willingness to make a change and consider giving up our championship game to get to the right postseason, I think our coaches and our administrators understand that tradeoff.”

The ACC and Big 12 also support a larger CFP; however, the SEC has yet to take an official stance, creating a roadblock to the Big Ten’s plans. The two conferences will need to agree on a new structure, or the CFP will remain at its current 12-team format.

“We feel strongly about it, and we’re working really hard with our colleagues and the other conferences,” Petitti said. “Obviously, the way this is structured, we understand that the SEC and the Big Ten have to come to an agreement, and we’re working hard to figure out ways to get to a solution. But inside our league, there is a deep commitment to 24 and the access.”
.
.
.
continued
 
Upvote 0
Big Ten’s 18 Schools, Commissioner Tony Petitti Unanimously Support 24-Team CFP: “We Feel Strongly About It”
The Big Ten has made its stance clear: Bigger is better when it comes to the College Football Playoff.
It's easy to support something you think will help you and your team. What Big Ten teams are going to make a 12-team playoff at least 80% of the time? Ohio State.... anyone else? Oregon? What Big Ten teams are going to make a 24-team playoff at least 80% of the time? Ohio State, Oregon, cheaters, Penn State, maybe Iowa, maybe Sparty, probably another west coast team. Plus you can count on another 2-4 teams getting in every year. Why wouldn't the Big Ten want it?
 
Upvote 0

TLDR:
Remember that one time in high school when that jerk-ass ass-ass punched you from behind? And when you turned around he was already hiding behind a teacher? Let's speculate about what might have happened if the teacher hadn't been there.
Or that time in grade school when someone bumped you at the drinking fountain and you got water down your pants, and people thought you peed your pants? Let's speculate about what might have happened if you weren't bumped.
Or that time you were too chicken to put the moves on that cute girl you liked? And then some other nerd swooped in at the party and you caught them smooching in the corner? Here's what might have happened if you made your move.
And some other things that might have happened, and if you weren't too busy living in the past you might enjoy some recent accomplishments.
 
Upvote 0
I'd place a fair wager they move to 16 in 2026. It doesn't matter what any of us think they should or shouldn't do. What do you think they will do?

A) stand pat/likely make the same amount of money
B) expand/likely make more money

I'm going to take what's behind door B any day of the week.

Yeah this was inevitable once the playoffs started. I think FCS also has 24 teams.

I prefer 12 or 16 max, but nothing we can do about it. They’ll fuck around and if ratings drop they’ll go back to 12/16. Just have to let it run its course.
 
Upvote 0
Yeah this was inevitable once the playoffs started. I think FCS also has 24 teams.

I prefer 12 or 16 max, but nothing we can do about it. They’ll fuck around and if ratings drop they’ll go back to 12/16. Just have to let it run its course.
i also don't like extending it much beyond even 10 or 12 because it makes the regular season less meaningful.

but... there's no way the ratings can drop. mathematically it would not go in that direction. more teams = more games = more money. it does somehow "devalue" the regular season, but it doesn't seem to get in the way with mlb, nba, nfl, nhl.

and with nil there's not going to be angst about letting college athletes endure more wear and tear.

so, as long as you don't drop more than something like 3 games in the regular season, and your roster isn't totally depleted, you're going to be in and able to make a run and earn more $$$.
 
Upvote 0
i also don't like extending it much beyond even 10 or 12 because it makes the regular season less meaningful.

but... there's no way the ratings can drop. mathematically it would not go in that direction. more teams = more games = more money. it does somehow "devalue" the regular season, but it doesn't seem to get in the way with mlb, nba, nfl, nhl.

and with nil there's not going to be angst about letting college athletes endure more wear and tear.

so, as long as you don't drop more than something like 3 games in the regular season, and your roster isn't totally depleted, you're going to be in and able to make a run and earn more $$$.

and the more you let in the more it promotes the narrative of "make a run".

This current first round exposure of the non elite teams is no bueno for ratings in the long run. Now they will be able to get idiots like Herbie spewing 'Cinderella!!!" when one mediocre team beats 2-3 mediocre teams before they face a big boy.

Reflexivity of a sort.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top