• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Cincinnati Reds 2023 (sell the team Bob)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Here is what I found on MLB.com

The teams with the three worst records in 2022 -- the Nationals, A’s and Pirates -- have the best chance (16.5 percent each) to get the No. 1 overall pick via the lottery, though all 18 non-playoff teams will have the chance to land it. The other teams will have declining percentages in reverse order of their records, down to 0.23 percent for the non-playoff club with the highest winning percentage.

As in previous years, any tie in regular-season record is broken by the record in the previous year, continuing with each subsequent prior year's record until the tie is broken.

Draft lottery odds for No. 1 pick

1. Nationals (55-107), 16.5 pct
2. A’s (60-102), 16.5
3. Pirates (62-100), 16.5
4. Reds (62-100), 13.2
5. Royals (65-97), 10.0
6. Tigers (66-96), 7.5
7. Rangers (68-94), 5.5
8. Rockies (68-94), 3.9
9. Marlins (69-93), 2.7
10. Angels (73-89), 1.8
11. D-backs (74-88), 1.4
12. Cubs (74-88), 1.1
13. Twins (78-84), 0.9
14. Red Sox (78-84), 0.8
15. White Sox (81-81), 0.6
16. Giants (81-81), 0.5
17. Orioles (83-79), 0.4
18. Brewers (86-76), 0.2

Any team in the lottery that doesn't land one of the top six picks will pick in reverse order of standings for picks 7-18. For example, if the Brewers don't get one of the lottery picks, they will pick 18th overall.

So they had the 4th best odds and missed on a top 6 lottery pick.

Fucking classic. They can't even get tanking right.
 
Upvote 0
Fungo Squiggly said:
Like it fucking matters. They can't draft any better than they do anything else.

Fuckers took Chad Mottola one pick ahead of Derek Jeter 30 years ago. And they'd do it again if they had the chance.
Click to expand...

If they drafted Jeter we'd be talking about how they could have had the HOFer Mottola with the same pick.

It's the Reds way.
 
Upvote 0
So MLBTR says Reds are talking to Cueto.

That would make a ton of sense for the vet innings eater/mentor the kids role.

As this is the Reds, and this idea makes sense, something terrible will happen and it will get fucked.

I’d love to be kicking it with Cueto again though so here is hoping.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top