Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Performance of the SEC so far does not bode well for the Tide. It proves those right that say Bama hasn't beaten anybody.
The Performance of the SEC so far does not bode well for the Tide. It proves those right that say Bama hasn't beaten anybody.
The same metric isn't exactly covering the PAC12 and UW in glory either
If conference bowl performance is valid, then we're fucked, as the ACC is currently 5-1 (per tonight's game) so far in bowls, with the B1G being 3-3. Still, I like our chances...True. I don't care about Saturday as much as 1/9 though.
I don't think that games lost by 6-6 teams against 10-2 teams count much against the SEC either. The lower order in the B1G and the SEC will always be up against teams that did better in lower power conferences, because the SEC and B1G will always have a team in the CFP. The B1G has done better than the SEC so far. Indiana played terribly and took Utah to the brink. A couple of unexpected wins. The PAC12 is the conference exposed so far, in my opinion.The Performance of the SEC so far does not bode well for the Tide. It proves those right that say Bama hasn't beaten anybody.
The Performance of the SEC so far does not bode well for the Tide. It proves those right that say Bama hasn't beaten anybody.
I'm not totally sold on only using end of year rankings. Teams change for better or worse throughout the year.It's been Bama and a bunch of nobodies filling sec top 25 quotas all year. The announcers kept mentioning arkansas had to play 8 straight top 25 teams as if those teams were still in the top 25. Gotta keep fueling the hype machine though. Bama is the only team to back it up
I'm not totally sold on only using end of year rankings. Teams change for better or worse throughout the year.
Exactly right, which is why not every higher ranked team is predicted to win vs lower ranked teams on a neutral field. In my mind, the end of year rankings are a reflection of what a team has done throughout the year. Sort of like an average, not a snapshot of current strength.I'm not totally sold on only using end of year rankings. Teams change for better or worse throughout the year.
I don't need think you could be more incorrect. Many Sec teams suffered and recovered from key injuries much more than usual.They do but the sec was pretty stagnant throughout the year. Just a bunch of mediocre teams living off past reputation. The B1G and ACC were far and away the superior conferences this year followed by the SEC with the Pac-12 and Big-12 bringing up the rear
I don't need think you could be more incorrect. Many Sec teams suffered and recovered from key injuries much more than usual.
I'm not totally sold on only using end of year rankings. Teams change for better or worse throughout the year.
All teams suffer from injuries, to different extents. The SEC!!11!! being 1-4 in bowl games so far can't mainly be attributed to injuries...I don't need think you could be more incorrect. Many Sec teams suffered and recovered from key injuries much more than usual.
I am. You have a far better idea of how good teams actually are at the end of the year than you did at the beginning.I'm not totally sold on only using end of year rankings. Teams change for better or worse throughout the year.