• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

CFN's Matt Zemek on JT and Texas

BrutusBobcat

Icon and Entertainer
I think his column is called "After Further Review". Here's his clip on Tressel:

Now, about Jim Tressel....

Much more needs to be said in defense of Ohio State’s coach; it’s hard to know where to start.

First of all, the same Ohio State fans who thought Troy Smith would be the bomb this year are now the fans who think Tressel gave Smith insufficient playing time. Yet, Smith threw for only 78 yards, hardly a clear sign of unmistakable superiority to Justin Zwick. Bucks fans seem to want to elevate Smith while looking past the fact that Smith, while hardly bad, was certainly not a devastating force as well. Bucks fans paint themselves into a corner and try to have it both ways when, on one hand, they say that Smith accounted for the vast majority of the team’s points from Saturday night against Texas, while on the other hand saying that the offense produced far too many field goals.

OK, so which is it? Did Smith account for a lot of points, or did he preside over way too many field goal drives that should have been touchdowns? Can’t have it both ways.

Ohio State fans get into an even bigger pickle when they rip Tressel’s play calling. This is true for two reasons. The first reason is that late in the third quarter, with Ohio State in control of the game and gaining momentum, Tressel certainly called the proper play and put Zwick in a position to score a touchdown with a perfect read and throw to Ryan Hamby, who simply dropped a pass (twice) in the end zone. You can’t blame Zwick, you can’t blame Tressel for having Zwick in the game, and you can’t blame Tressel for the play he called. Sometimes in life—and I know this all too well—you can do everything right and yet have no outward results, because other people you depended on didn’t hold up their end of the bargain. It seems harsh to keep harping on this—it’s obviously nothing personal—but if you want to be coldly analytical about this game, it’s simply a reality that Ryan Hamby made the single most debilitating play of the game for Ohio State, who largely outplayed Texas but didn’t have the “W” to show for it at the end. Life can be like that sometimes—it’s not fair, and it certainly can’t be easy to take for a proud Buckeye fan base. But you just have to live with that.

The second and much more important reason why you just can’t blame Jim Tressel for his play-calling is that this man went 14-0, winning a national title with this same basic football philosophy. When a coach coaches against his normal instincts and loses, that’s a problem. It’s supremely frustrating when a coach allows his own unique football vision to be steamrollered by a cowardly concession to other voices or circumstances; that’s what good leaders never, ever allow to happen. But when a coach makes controversial decisions that nevertheless flow from his innate understanding of the game and his own football philosophies, you have to give the man credit for being true to himself. You have to admire coaches who are philosophically consistent; you don’t have to agree with them, but you have to respect them, and this is exponentially more true when coaches who are philosophically consistent produce big-time results. Tressel has done that in his career in Columbus, and therefore he’s earned that level of respect.

If Ryan Hamby does his job, we’re not talking about how bad a job Jim Tressel “supposedly” did. After his defense contained Vince Young as a runner, and after his team largely dictated tempo, field position and other essentials of a football game for most of the night, Tressel should be receiving applause. But again, you can sometimes do your level best and have nothing to show for it. That’s the inconvenient truth about Jim Tressel, and Buckeye fans need to come to grips with it, realizing what this man has done for their football program.

You want to go back to John Cooper, all y’all?

Something tells me that certain Buckeye fans have been emailing some idiocy to CFN....
 
If Ryan Hamby does his job, we’re not talking about how bad a job Jim Tressel “supposedly” did. After his defense contained Vince Young as a runner, and after his team largely dictated tempo, field position and other essentials of a football game for most of the night, Tressel should be receiving applause. But again, you can sometimes do your level best and have nothing to show for it. That’s the inconvenient truth about Jim Tressel, and Buckeye fans need to come to grips with it, realizing what this man has done for their football program.

You want to go back to John Cooper, all y’all?

We get the point. It's time to move on.....let's not dwell, it does no good. I'm not surre what this guy was trying to get across, but I have moved on.........I honestly don't want to think about that Texas game. :wink2:
 
Upvote 0
I think his column is called "After Further Review". Here's his clip on Tressel:



Something tells me that certain Buckeye fans have been emailing some idiocy to CFN....


I honestly believe that unless we have 4 or 5 losing seasons in a row (JoePaesque?!?) that we will never be able to get rid of the idiots that reside on our wagon. Hell, with my luck they would just jump back on as soon as tOSU started winning again. :shake:
 
Upvote 0
It just pisses me off that we have to hear this "calling out" after a loss, and ONLY after a loss. Get off the damn bandwagon, the rest of us Fans will yell loud enough to make up for the loss of you at gameday.

I heard a caller on 1460 yesterday say, "Tressel ball just doesnt work."

Are you kidding me? No. It works, buddy, but you don't like it. It's not flashy. I'm with CFN on this on, if Ohio State wins (as it should have considering the dominance exhibited (again hats off to Tex. for standing up when it had to)) we're hearing from these same goons how Tressel is a great big game coach, and he's the greatest play caller of all time, cause he knew to keep it close to the vest rather than risk TO's. Fucking pisses me off.

OHIO STATE LOSES SOMETIMES. OK? It fucking happens. When it happens, it's not time for wholesale change. In 2003 when OSU lost, it's not time to throw in Scott McMullen. In 2004 it's not time to revamp the coaching staff. In 2005, there is no wholesale change that needs to happen. If you know the least bit... and I do mean the LEAST bit, about football, you know these nitwit opinions like McMullen is better than Krenzel (based on what? seeing 7 McMullen snaps over 2 years?) are hurting, not helping the program (if anything)

People like that give OSU fandom a bad image. I like to think we're smarter than that. Let the Sooner fans call for teh coaches head after a loss. Not Ohio State fans. Fucking Chickenlittle motherfuckers.

*bows*
Thank you.
 
Upvote 0
There's a lot of good stuff left in this football season, even if MNC does not factor into the equation (which it most likely will not). When you step back and look at the big picture, a one or two loss season with wins over Michigan and/or the bowl opponent is always satisfying. I think we're in great position for such a season.....

And, I think Zwick, Hamby, Smith, Tressel, etc...all wanted to beat Texas just as badly as any whiny internet fan who e-mails CFN, ESPN, and CNNSI with their complaints. Based on this column and Ivan Maisel's recap of his last weekend, it sounds like an inordinate amount of Buckeye followers were taking dirty laundry "out of house" after the loss. I don't mind registering some complaints on a message board with fellow believers (I did as much), but this idea of e-mailing national columnists about the stuff...I don't get it.
 
Upvote 0
BKB -- absolutely agree with you on this - that 1460 caller is one of the sad delusional "fans" that wants their cake and to eat it too.

In my view the best parallel between Tressel-era Buckeyes and other teams in D1A football is to the Stallings-era Crimson Tide of '92. I always made sure that I watched that team play whenever I could. Thankfully, due to scheduling quirks there were plenty of Alabama games during their '92 NC season that made their way onto the airwaves -- late in the day after the Buckeyes had played.

Superb, athletic defense, (largely) mistake-free football on both sides of the ball. That was the hallmark of the '92 Tide team. They did not however regularly score huge numbers of points - however, they did not need to do so. More critical to the parallel I seek to draw they oftentimes benefited from defensive scores (such as Langham's 4th Q interception return for a TD against Florida), or to get them short field.

1992
Won 13, Lost 0
Unanimous National Champions, SEC Champions
Coach Gene Stallings
25 Vanderbilt 8 Tuscaloosa (TV) Sept. 5
17 Southern Miss 10 Birmingham Sept. 12
38 Arkansas 11 Little Rock (N) Sept. 19
13 Louisiana Tech 0 Birmingham Sept. 26
48 South Carolina 7 Tuscaloosa Oct. 3
37 Tulane 0 New Orleans (N) Oct. 10
17 Tennessee 10 Knoxville (TV) Oct. 17
31 Ole Miss 10 Tuscaloosa Oct. 24
31 LSU 11 Baton Rouge (TV) Nov. 7
30 Miss. State 21 Starkville (N, TV) Nov. 14
17 Auburn 0 Birmingham (TV) Nov. 26
28 Florida 21 Birmingham (TV) Dec. 5
*34 Miami 13 Sugar Bowl (N, TV) Jan . 1
Alabama 366 Opponents 122

This is the closest (in college football at least) to the style of play Tressel seems to lean on -- and, frankly, in my view there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. It puts the Buckeyes in good company.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top