No, it isn't. Auburn played LSU, Georgia, and Tennessee twice (2nd meeting w/ 3rd string QB). Ole Miss, MSU, Arkansas, Alabama, and Kentucky hardly qualify as a difficult schedule. Auburn dodged Florida in the rotation this year, which hurt their SOS. The premise that the SEC is inherently more difficult is wrong.StadiumDorm said:And if my school played in the SEC, I'ld play a weak out of conference schedule too. With the championship game, that conference is murderer's row.
How was Auburn's schedule any different from a team like the Buckeyes playing Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan, followed by a bunch of teams that were merely pretty good (Purdue, Mich State) and then the scrubs (Penn State, Indiana)?
Oklahoma had to play Oklahoma State, Texas, Texas A&M, and Texas Tech, but that didn't stop them from scheduling Oregon and Bowling Green (BGSU was probably the better team between those two!).
As of Monday, Dec 6, the BCS standings show Oklahoma with the #1 ranking in computer average (.990), USC is 2nd (.970) and Auburn is 3rd (.920). The actual BCS percentages though are USC in 1st (.9770), Oklahoma in 2nd (.9681), and Auburn in 3rd (.9331). In other words, the difference between Auburn and Oklahoma in the BCS (.035) is smaller than the difference between 2nd and 3rd places in the computer polls (.050). If Auburn had played a good MAC school and a directional Michigan instead of some Sun Belt conference teams and a 1AA, they'd be in the Orange Bowl.
Upvote
0