When I read the article yesterday, I thought it was wrong to include an allegation against somebody based on the guy saying he was already taking money from another agent. They could be told that simply because the person saying it wanted to have them go away. It doesn't prove that the player that said that was guilty of anything, and shouldn't have been included along with the stuff they have about giving things directly to other players.
If they were actually talking about somebody besides Santonio, it's pathetic to include the name of a Super Bowl MVP as a case of mistaken identity.
If they were actually talking about somebody besides Santonio, it's pathetic to include the name of a Super Bowl MVP as a case of mistaken identity.
Upvote
0