• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

360 NCAA13 Online Dynasty V (planning)

Army
Ball State
Bowling Green
Buffalo
Central Michigan
Eastern Michigan
FAU
Hawaii
Idaho
Indiana
Kansas
Kent St.
Marshall
Memphis
Miami(OH)
MTSU
Minnesota
Navy
New Mexico
New Mexico St.
North Texas
NIU
Oregon St.
Rice
San Jose
Texas St.
Troy
Tulane
UAB
UL Lafayette
UL Monroe
UMass
UNLV
UTEP
UTSA
Utah St.
Vanderbilt
Washington St.
Western Kentucky
West Michigan
Wyoming

All currently rated 79 or worse
 
Upvote 0
Bucknut24;2163940; said:
I personally don't like it, it's kind of a pain to have to switch teams from different conferences every season

It's a cool idea but I feel like it would blow up the conferences like crazy.

Plus I like recruiting for one team for a few years to build them up, then possibly move up
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeMac;2163951; said:
It's a cool idea but I feel like it would blow up the conferences like crazy.

Plus I like recruiting for one team for a few years to build them up, then possibly move up

I just like being able to stay in the same conf with the people and building like a rivalry..

I loved being able to play Gomer every season in NCAA11 since the winner usually won the conf (since you were always out of the picture :lol:)
 
Upvote 0
This may be too hard..but here's a proposition for conference alignment

Say we have 3 conf of 4 teams...and for example i'll use myself, mac, gomer and jwins for example..

We'll have 2 in each division (that way it can be user v user for conf title)

we'll put Jwins and Mac in div a and Myself in gomer in div b..

Jwins has a protected game against gomer, and I have one against Mac...so that gives us 2 guaranteed user conf..now we're kinda at the mercy of the CPU if I play Jwins and Mac plays gomer..

but if it doesn't happen schedule a user from another Conf to make up for it (one that may have 2 as well)

just a thought, but that may be too difficult, I just like to be able to play a user for the conf championship
 
Upvote 0
Bucknut24;2163956; said:
This may be too hard..but here's a proposition for conference alignment

Say we have 3 conf of 4 teams...and for example i'll use myself, mac, gomer and jwins for example..

We'll have 2 in each division (that way it can be user v user for conf title)

we'll put Jwins and Mac in div a and Myself in gomer in div b..

Jwins has a protected game against gomer, and I have one against Mac...so that gives us 2 guaranteed user conf..now we're kinda at the mercy of the CPU if I play Jwins and Mac plays gomer..

but if it doesn't happen schedule a user from another Conf to make up for it (one that may have 2 as well)

just a thought, but that may be too difficult, I just like to be able to play a user for the conf championship

How fair is it that the winless player gets to be in a conference with one of the better if not the best in the league? :lol:

Why don't you step on my head while I'm drowning
 
Upvote 0
Putting 4 teams in 3 conferences is not hard, though I've always done it in the same division. 2 per would be interesting, though it would run the risk of inequal user game totals like you mentioned.

The other thing is that when you are building up your program, it is crucial to win and recruit during rivalry games.

Maybe we do our own thing at random schools until everyone arrives at a BCS school, then we pool them in 3 conferences?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top