• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

360 NCAA13 Online Dynasty V (planning)

jwinslow;2171262; said:
Teambuilder drops on Thursday, so we should be able to browse various teams more closely.

What do you guys think? 3* and 72 ovr? Too low/high?

I think 72 is a little low. Looking at the ratings, they are really high. Probably need to be closer to 79.

I am not sure how this all works, but are we going with current conferences or can we make our own? If we go with current (real life) conferences, in order to have 3 conferences that have 2 divisions, 1 will at least have to be a BCS conference. Unless something has changed that I missed, the only non BCS conferences that have 2 divisions are the MAC and Conference USA.
 
Upvote 0
I think it depends if the edited rosters change many overall ratings....a lot of teams are highly rated that shouldn't be..so it's hard to put a number til we see how many schools there are.....somewhere back I made a post woth teams that met a certain criteria......

Also...as long as I get Mac and gomer in my conference..I'm a happy man
 
Upvote 0
Akron - 63
Buffalo - 71
FAU - 60
Idaho - 65
Kent State - 71
Memphis - 61
MTSU - 65
New Mexico - 65
New Mexico St. - 65
North Texas - 69
Texas State - 65
Tulane - 65
UAB - 65
UL Monroe - 69
UMass - 60
UNLV - 63
UTSA - 63

Off by 1. 17 teams. As mentioned, though, they may change.
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;2171270; said:
In the past, we shot for lower tier B1G level teams.

What kind of teams do you guys think we should use? I don't have any strong preferences yet.

Even the low level Big Ten teams right now have higher ratings than 72. Indiana is 77, and Minnesota is 77. I believe the rest are in the 80's. Like I mentioned, the ratings are really high.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top