Premierdrum on the Weiss/stolen practice footage allegations:

Conventional wisdom says that scUM would've cut a deal in the sign stealing scandal (Sign-gate) if the NCAA were only going to impose some fines and a few recruiting restrictions, and that scUM is fighting Sign-gate because the potential sanctions would be much more severe. This is probably part of the equaton.
However, if PD is correct and the NCAA has scUM "dead to rights" on the stolen practice footage case (Video-gate), then it is in scUM's best interest to fight Sign-gate to the bitter end regardless of the severity of the potential sanctions in that case. With scUM already taking the L in Burgergate and now possibly staring down major sanctions in Video-gate, then losing Sign-gate would make scUM a three-peat offender ... and who knows what kind of sanctions he NCAA would impose on a three-peat offender.

Conventional wisdom says that scUM would've cut a deal in the sign stealing scandal (Sign-gate) if the NCAA were only going to impose some fines and a few recruiting restrictions, and that scUM is fighting Sign-gate because the potential sanctions would be much more severe. This is probably part of the equaton.
However, if PD is correct and the NCAA has scUM "dead to rights" on the stolen practice footage case (Video-gate), then it is in scUM's best interest to fight Sign-gate to the bitter end regardless of the severity of the potential sanctions in that case. With scUM already taking the L in Burgergate and now possibly staring down major sanctions in Video-gate, then losing Sign-gate would make scUM a three-peat offender ... and who knows what kind of sanctions he NCAA would impose on a three-peat offender.