The committee has been pretty consistent with their final rankings the last two years. They dropped both TCU and Baylor out while adding us because of the conference championship game.
You may not remember this, but Ohio State (12-1) had a better record than either TCU (11-1) or Baylor (11-1) when the final 2014 playoff rankings came out. It seems only logical that the team with the better record made the playoffs over the teams with the worse record.
And quite frankly, we don't know what the playoff committee would have done if Ohio State had beaten Wisconsin 19-17 instead of 59-0. They may have thrown the "better record" logic out the window, gone with a gut feeling, and put TCU into the playoffs.
You can't really say that the committee has been "consistent" when they have only a two-year track record.
Last year they ranked 1 loss Ohio state behind a 2 loss PAC 12 champion. And put a boy so great Sparty in at No. 4.
And how did Sparty in the playoffs work? A 38-0 shellacking at the hands of Alabama, that's how. Nobody wants to see a repeat of that.
Sparty had lucky victories on the last play of the game against both Michigan and Ohio State, then squeaked out a 3-point win over Iowa in the CCG to "earn" their sport in the playoffs. The committee should have realized that Ohio State was the better team despite the head-to-head loss and told Sparty to go pound salt. The committee will have to do that this year if Penn State or Wisconsin, or god forbid Nebraska, ends up the Big Ten champ. There's no way the committee can send one of those teams (especially Nebraska) to the slaughter over an 11-1 Ohio State team with victories over (presumably) top-10 teams Oklahoma, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
The idea is to get the four best teams, not the four best conference champions. Let's hope the playoff committee remembers their mandate this year.