Gcashwell
Heisman
My last post on this. I wrote about three teams that had good running games. Running games aren't just running backs. Again three teams.A) This statement itself seems rather passive-aggressive and indirect? If you want change, just say it outright.
B) I agree and said as much
I don't think he's instigating at all.
However how am I supposed to take his declarative statements seriously when he says something like "Miss St. has a great run game", and then in the very next post doesn't know who their feature RB is ??
How would you like me to respond? At first I thought he and beau were vacillating to avoid the discussion. And certainly the latter was part of how we ended up with split threads as Mili stated outright in the shenanigans thread.
If you wrote a post about Michigan having a great QB, and then repeatedly asked who Gardner was... I'm pretty sure some people would be astounded. That deserves some criticism for intellectual dishonesty and trying to bs everyone.
You responded with one common name. We have an OT named cam robinson, but it didn't seem like he would fit, but he is part of our running game. I got confused. Sorry.
Three teams. Running attack, not running back.
Sorry I'm stupid. Can we move on?
Upvote
0