-
Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
- Thread starter DZ83CK
- Start date
wigmon
Heisman
One example of why I think they are different. Both were considered pretty good football prospects. Lighty was being recruited as a wide receiver, Tate as a defensive end. They are different in body composition and the types of athletels they are.
I think a slightly less athletic Paul Harris is a good comparison. What Scout said about Harris I think applies equally to Tate. Harris had 2G height in a PF build. His ball handling was a little suspect and developed into a decent shooter.
He's kind of in position limbo until he's able to stroke his jumpshot. Strong in his drives to the basket and an excellent finisher. One of the best rebounding wings in the class. Powerful dunker. Very hard to guard and creates matchup issues.
Scouting Powerful guard who can actually play a few perimeter positions. Toughness is one of his signature attributes.
I think a slightly less athletic Paul Harris is a good comparison. What Scout said about Harris I think applies equally to Tate. Harris had 2G height in a PF build. His ball handling was a little suspect and developed into a decent shooter.
He's kind of in position limbo until he's able to stroke his jumpshot. Strong in his drives to the basket and an excellent finisher. One of the best rebounding wings in the class. Powerful dunker. Very hard to guard and creates matchup issues.
Scouting Powerful guard who can actually play a few perimeter positions. Toughness is one of his signature attributes.
Upvote
0
